Using multiple (like 40) TL074s...
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 28th April 2004, 06:07 PM #31 hermanv   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Northern California You're determined to make me get out the calculator (and maybe even read the data sheet ). But I'll stick to guessing. Each op-amp is good for about, what, 5 milliamps? So a 1 Ohm resistor would cause (current) saturation if one op-amp wanted it's output at +5 millivolts and some other op amps thought that -5 millvolts was dandy. Even with 10 Ohms the offset will limit the total voltage swing on some of the op amps pretty quickly. If the output current is substantially higher than 5 milliamps then you are right, my guesses of resistor values are high. Depending on power supply voltage there is an exact answer, but it is most likely higher than 10 Ohms.
 28th April 2004, 06:55 PM #32 Stocker   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin CALCULATOR CALCULATOR CALCULATOR CALCULATOR CALCULATOR Break out the datasheet! From the horses' mouths: http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tl074.pdf And don't forget the bass drivers! http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM324.pdf Product folders... http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/produc...rtNumber=TL074 http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM324.html __________________ Jesus loves you.
 28th April 2004, 07:31 PM #33 Stocker   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin It just occurred to me: Could the resistors be largely eliminated or reduced in value if each amp had its own feedback network instead of one global network? BTW the TL074 datasheet says about a hair over 200mW Pdiss each. __________________ Jesus loves you.
 28th April 2004, 10:14 PM #34 hermanv   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Northern California There was a whole flurry of Op-amp evaluations for audio some years back. All of the TL0.. series were considered pretty much OK but (and memory grows dim) I seem to recall the 324 was thought to be a true stinker. The headphone idea would allow evaluatiion with considerably less time investment. Headphones, headphones, anyone? Anyone at all?
 29th April 2004, 04:00 AM #35 jcx   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. a 44 op amp/channel power amp? http://headwize2.powerpill.org/proje...meier3_prj.htm
 29th April 2004, 03:07 PM #36 Stocker   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin Headphones? you want to use 300 opamps to power *headphones*?! If I am going to do this, it better be able to push amps through low-single-digit-ohms voice coils, be they headphones or no. The 44 opamp amp is cool. It is also in the 6th post in this thread. __________________ Jesus loves you.
 6th May 2004, 01:47 PM #37 Stocker   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin I was talking to an engineer friend of mine after church last night and he surprised me by not thinking this was all that crazy an idea. I proposed using the LM324s as drivers and TL074s as active feedback chips, and he said that I'd have to be careful. Since the 324s are bipolar and 074s are CMOS the 074s might pick up switching noise from the power supply rails from the 324s loading it... "Careful bypassing will be required". That stumped me until I remembered my pile of voltage regulators...Put them on different power supplies altogether. Figure 14 LM324s and maybe 50 TL074s per 7815/7915 combination. and 0.1uF caps like candy all over the place... For ease of signal wiring I was thinking of alternating 324s and 074s, driver, feedback, driver, feedback etc. all the way across... __________________ Jesus loves you.
Stocker
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
Still noodling this...

The positive rail of the TL07x is included in the common mode range, so separate power supplies are out, but careful (read: lots of caps) bypassing should take care of it. The bigger problem may be ground loops with such long rails, but a fat ground rail or a ground plane may cure that.

I have heard that the TL07x has a 15mA wire-bond limit and I have also heard 18mA. Seems better to shoot for 12mA to be on the safe side.

I never knew large sheets of proto board were so expensive!

I generated a spreadsheet based on some simple algebra and it's pretty useful if you want to parallel any number of amplifiers. Let's see if anyone has some comments on it.
Attached Files
 ampcalx.zip (4.2 KB, 30 views)
__________________
Jesus loves you.

 18th December 2004, 05:41 AM #39 Stocker   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin I was looking for something else and found this thread. What a gas! Anyhow, all this fuss was about DC offsets and one time an engineer told me something like...if you aren't amplifying DC, why not just use a cap? duh. Good thing he didn't tell me that when I was thinking of doing this mess! also, the 15mA wire-bond current-limit was a misheard 50mA which seems more like a thermal dissipation limit with any sort of moderate output voltage! Anyways, please join me in rolling your eyes (at me) __________________ Jesus loves you.
 19th December 2004, 02:50 PM #40 Mr Evil   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Behind you I for one applaud your adventurousness! So many naysayers... ignore them. Using a capacitor to block DC offset per op-amp is a good idea, but you would still need a resistor to account for differences in gain between op-amps. Using matched resistor arrays would alleviate that problem a bit. Hmmm... perhaps you could try making a 40-phase class D amplifier instead. There's a thought... __________________ https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post boogs Subwoofers 5 13th November 2007 05:36 AM coloradosound Subwoofers 10 9th December 2006 09:13 PM goldyrathore Subwoofers 38 7th July 2005 11:21 AM adason Solid State 3 2nd June 2005 10:04 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 PM.