Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd March 2004, 03:55 PM   #11
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
goldyrathore,

Have you measured your speakers?

It seems most likely to me that they have a lumpy impedance plot, and this is sucking all of the power out of the bottom end. This effect is much more significant than components or construction, and should be ruled out first.
__________________
Al
I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 09:05 AM   #12
Morse is offline Morse  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: US for now.....
Hi goldyrathore;

I'm with Pink Mouse on this.

Check out the spec sheets on both chips - the LM3876 is pretty much dedicated to 8r loads (pg 9, "output power vs load resistance"), while the TDA2009 actually does better with 4r loads than 8r loads (pg 5, "output power vs supply voltage" - check out the 4r vs 8r curves!!). Thus if you're using 4r speakers, or if there's a big dip in the impedence somewhere in the midbass, it's going to suck the life right out of the system.

Good luck on it and all the best!
Morse

PS Yes, breakin CAN make a big improvement in the sound of some components IME, but the differences between those two chips performance into low z loads is eye-opening!
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 03:09 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
Default Breakin and heatsinks.

Hi Goldyrathore,
Can we just call you Goldy ?
Break in of components was something that I was very skeptical about a few years ago. I have a CD67SE that was 'awful' and a Denon amp that sounded flat when I got them . As a result I hardly used them since I have other alternatives. Then the 'alternatives' went out of service due to upgrades and broken parts. So these units came back into service. Both went through opamp changes - obviously - but did not improve as much as desired. However they had to be used till the others came back on line. That was about 9 weeks or so. The transformation has been quite dramatic. I am sure more tweaks will improve this further , but it DID make a difference. So sit back and relax. Pass judgement after at least two weeks of use.

About the heatsink. Bass transients occur fast and if the heat sink is not adequate it will raise the junction temperature dramatically causing all kinds of problems. However when the transient is gone the temp falls. The duration is so short that it will not raise the temp of the heat sink significantly and you might hardly see any long term effect on the heatsink.
So use as big a heatsink as you can accomodate - within reason of course.
In addition , if you are using a 1000uF power supply cap as some people do , you probably will hardly get any bass due to power supply drop. Especially if the speaker impedance is low. Use at least 4700uf or preferably 10,000uF. I can hear lots of protests , but it is up to you to determine what sounds best in your system.

I am still working on my LM3886 gainclone with 4700uF supply caps per channel ( 4700+4700).
Cheers.
Ashok

Don't forget that the load on your preamp is 10K ohms. So check the output cap on your preamp. The one on the power amp is big enough but the one on the preamp output may be not big enough- if there is one over there.
__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 04:09 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
Default Re: Breakin and heatsinks.

Quote:
Originally posted by ashok

In addition , if you are using a 1000uF power supply cap as some people do , you probably will hardly get any bass due to power supply drop. Especially if the speaker impedance is low. Use at least 4700uf or preferably 10,000uF. I can hear lots of protests , but it is up to you to determine what sounds best in your system.

I am still working on my LM3886 gainclone with 4700uF supply caps per channel ( 4700+4700).
As I have been away from this Forum for some time, what I am going to say may have already been discussed.

The question on the capacitance being small if you want more bass can be solved by bi-amplifying. These chip amps are simple enough to use two of them with separate pots at the input to balance the levels of both sections.

Such a setup would work better if you are using a subwoofer, that is a 2-way for highs + mid/mid-low and a sub for the low.

Then you can use just 1000uF for the 2-way amp and 10,000uF or more for the sub amp.

A simple 2nd order filter at the input might do the cross (besides the passive xover inside the 2-way) or you may try an active one. My preference is for the former, to keep things simple.

Then you would have the best of both worlds.



Carlos
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 05:14 PM   #15
DeonC is offline DeonC  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
DeonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kimberley, South-Africa
Hi there

May I add one more suggestion. In your first post you wrote:

Quote:
1> I used a 15-0-15 5 Amp transformer for the supply
If I am correct that translates to a 150VA trannie. Have you considered upgrading the trannie to a 220VA or better? I wuld go as far as suggesting you go as big as you can get. It is known that a 700VA trannie for a PRE-amp makes a HUGE difference over a 300VA, so my suggestion is not totally mad.

I would also suggest upping the total capacitance of the PSU. Adding some larger caps could just be beneficial to the low-end.

One last suggestion is this- if you're going to stay at low voltages, try experimenting with battery power. Find a shop that sells 2nd hand car batteries, and use that as the basis for your PSU. I would still suggest bridging the battery with a handful of small caps (1000uF down to 4.7uF) as this will just improve the 'speed'.

I hope this helps.

Enjoy,
Deon (who is far out there )
__________________
Reality is not digital, an on-off state, but analog.
Terry Pratchett - Moving Pictures
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 06:51 PM   #16
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
Quote:
Have you considered upgrading the trannie to a 220VA or better? I wuld go as far as suggesting you go as big as you can get. It is known that a 700VA trannie for a PRE-amp makes a HUGE difference over a 300VA, so my suggestion is not totally mad.
The amp that I built based on the same circuit that Goldy uses (but with the 3875 chip) produced almost too much bass. It had a single 120VA transformer!

I am sure that 700VA for a preamp makes a difference over a 300VA - but an improvement?

As others here, I suspect that the problem may lie with the speaker matching.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 07:05 PM   #17
DeonC is offline DeonC  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
DeonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kimberley, South-Africa
Hi Nuuk

Quote:
I am sure that 700VA for a preamp makes a difference over a 300VA - but an improvement?
Well, here's what Neil McBride had to say:
Quote:
To cut to the kill, the big coil does add a bigger, more expansive sound with noticeably bigger and deeper bass.
The part that got my attention was:
Quote:
... noticeably bigger and deeper bass.
As a confirmed bass-freak, that equals HUGE in my books

Enjoy,
Deon
__________________
Reality is not digital, an on-off state, but analog.
Terry Pratchett - Moving Pictures
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 07:23 PM   #18
tg3 is offline tg3  United States
diyAudio Member
 
tg3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
You have tried the speakers with another amp, right?
__________________
If you don't measure, you don't know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 02:15 AM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
Cool I have 4Ohm speakers

Yes, I do have 4 Ohm speakers and that is screwing things up.
I will try another gainclone with LM3886 and keep you guys posted in the same thread.

Ashok, Do you have PCB track layouts for 3886 gainclone with you that u can share.

Thanks in advance,
Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gainclone LM4780 (poor bass ?) nickthevoice Chip Amps 66 31st March 2007 11:36 PM
Bass and treble adjustment in gainclone pikkujöpö Chip Amps 9 4th November 2005 05:23 PM
LM3876 vs. LM3875 Wynand Chip Amps 3 12th July 2005 09:03 PM
Lm3876 bobossa Chip Amps 1 1st March 2005 04:18 PM
No output of a LM3876 GainClone??? Cradle22 Chip Amps 6 17th January 2003 10:26 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.13842 seconds (76.06% PHP - 23.94% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio