Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th May 2004, 04:11 PM   #501
Colin is offline Colin  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Is it possible to supply integrated front panel (with hols for pots) with no printing?

Colin
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 04:16 PM   #502
Cappy is offline Cappy  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern Willamette Valley
I vote for the "Specialized" without the "Kits".

To be honest, "Kits" sounds a little down market to me for something on display in a living room.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 04:30 PM   #503
indoubt is offline indoubt  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
indoubt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweet lake city
Prefer, Volume indication and selection indication but no logo
__________________
better be indoubt untill you're sure
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 04:36 PM   #504
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
Quote:
Originally posted by Colin
Is it possible to supply integrated front panel (with hols for pots) with no printing?
No problem with that

Quote:
Originally posted by Cappy
To be honest, "Kits" sounds a little down market to me for something on display in a living room.
My feeling exactly.

I will see what can be done. If it's no problem for them to omit the logo while silkscreening, then I'll go for that option. Otherwise, one can always remove it himself, it shouldn't be a big problem. Just post your preferrence, so I know how many changes apply.
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 05:32 PM   #505
tg3 is offline tg3  United States
diyAudio Member
 
tg3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Source and Volume look good.

The logo, as is, looks like a giant billboard. It breaks up the smooth, minimalist flow of the front.

I vote either the logo is moved to right lower corner (and made smaller), or omitted.

If you keep the logo in the center, then omit 'kits' and make it smaller.

My .017 EU.
__________________
Folly befits a fool.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 09:07 PM   #506
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kalifornia
I say if it doesn't cost anything to put them on as in the cost is already bundled into the chassis price, just go ahead and put it on. It is very simple to remove from an end user standpoint.

But the word "kit" I don't care for. A small lower left or right hand corner logo would suffice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 09:59 PM   #507
Jamh is offline Jamh  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jamh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: sacramento
Peter, for those of us who specified "no silk screening", there will be none, right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 10:22 PM   #508
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
No silkscreening is no problem, just let me know.

Here's the revised version of front panel. I kinda like it now
Attached Images
File Type: jpg log.jpg (13.8 KB, 585 views)
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 10:46 PM   #509
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
And with better resolution
Attached Images
File Type: jpg log1.jpg (16.1 KB, 553 views)
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2004, 10:59 PM   #510
cowanrg is offline cowanrg  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cowanrg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lafayette, CO
Send a message via AIM to cowanrg
peter, almost everyone that has voiced an opinion has said they would like to see no logo and also an indication for volume (ticks or something). you said you would go with the majority, and the overwhelming majority has said they dont like the logo on there.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2