|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
Hi!
Putting a 22uF polarized cap between R4 and ground reduced offset to 12 mV, but also introduced massive distortions! Still not the way to go...
__________________
************************ A Sacrifice For Freedom |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
f(-3) for 22uF/100ohm is ca 70Hz, what is too high. Try 220uF, maybe. Regards |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
Actually, 220 uF was what I tried out first, but DC was only reduced from 335 mV without cap to 270 mV with 220 uF cap...
Maybe it would be better to increase R3 / R4, but it still bothers me that Kuei said that such values should not be used... Thanks so far, Arndt
__________________
************************ A Sacrifice For Freedom |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
It seems to me, however, that you will want to reduce the values of those two resistors in order to reduce your DC offset. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
Hi!
Quote:
I know how to calculate the feedback resistors. And I would say that it is easier to reach lower DC offset by increasing the values, but still there was this statement of someone who said that the feedback resistors should be small in a sallen-key topology, which should lead to a better rolloff at the XO frequency. Don't know if I have the time to do some more work on this today, and tomorrow I'm off for Saas Fee (which is what I've built this thing for in the first run)... Bye, Arndt
__________________
************************ A Sacrifice For Freedom |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
Hi!
Well, looking at the thomson application notes for the TDA2030A, where they implement something like I want to do, I realize that they also added polarized caps in series to the output, which is also a (not preferred) way to get rid of DC offset... But since sound quality is not of highest priority on my wish list, I will also try that (it should still be better than the average boombox out there). Bye, Arndt
__________________
************************ A Sacrifice For Freedom |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Hi,
this schematic works well (checked) with LM3875. (without C3 DC offset is about 70mV) Regards |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
Hi!
I've built "your" circuit exactly as you described it, but without C3, and got -2.4 V DC offset... I think I will leave this idea alone, get me some active XO boards from ESP, and use them... No use for my upcoming holiday, but the next one is in February... Thanks anyway, Arndt
__________________
************************ A Sacrifice For Freedom |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need PCB urgent!!! | Mlaen | Chip Amps | 4 | 5th February 2004 01:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09937 seconds (76.21% PHP - 23.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |