Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th December 2003, 10:17 AM   #1
Optical is offline Optical  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Default Reducing DC offset on a NIGC?

Hi,
I have built this exact circuit with an LM3886, (well actually its got a 770 instead of a 680R resistor and a 1K input resistor but they will be changed/removed tomorrow..) but im not sure whether i have a safe dc offset or not..

I have built 2 of them and get 59mV on one and 72mV on the other side..
Im have some expensive speakers so i have only hooked the amp up to a cheap subwoofer, it works well but i cant comment on the tone quality as yet

So are there any 'tricks' to lower the dc offset to a few mV or so?
Help and advice appreciated!


Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2003, 10:25 AM   #2
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
The offset values you have got aren't anything to worry about if you are concerend about the speakers. My rule is <50 mV is good, bad over 100 mV. This is just my opinion.

The speaker has a limit when you will get increased dist and a second one when it become damaged (which is several volts).
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2003, 10:34 AM   #3
Optical is offline Optical  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Hmm, ok well thats good to know..
But before i put it in a box and forget about it..
Is there any components that directly relate to dc offset in that circuit that i can have a play with to try and bring it down into the 'good zone'??
Or is it more of a black art and i shouldn really bother?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2003, 10:47 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
ashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 3RS
Default More parts -- degrade sound ??

It looks like the chip has no other terminals that you can use.
One method might be to connect your 680 ohms to ground through a large capacitor..... I guess a bad thing to do - polar or non polar! But that would drop the dc gain to 1 and hopefully reduce the error. There can still be inherent errors that you can only remove ( like if you want 1mV ?) by injecting additional voltage to one of the inputs. Something that I would VERY strongly advise against.
It would be better to leave things as they are. Anything else added on to drop the dc offset might just degrade the sound.
You might also open a Pandora's Box ! Your chips are alive now. Let them stay that way .

Can't you keep your hands away from an already good performance ? Just enjoy the music .
Cheers.
__________________
AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2003, 10:58 AM   #5
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: More parts -- degrade sound ??

Quote:
Originally posted by ashok
It looks like the chip has no other terminals that you can use.
One method might be to connect your 680 ohms to ground through a large capacitor..... I guess a bad thing to do - polar or non polar! But that would drop the dc gain to 1 and hopefully reduce the error. There can still be inherent errors that you can only remove ( like if you want 1mV ?) by injecting additional voltage to one of the inputs. Something that I would VERY strongly advise against.
It's no harm to trim away this offset. The only thing you have to think of is to inject a clean current so you won't get more noise and hum. Just create a voltage divider 12 V -> 10 mV (or so). Make sure this 12 V is well filtered and stabilized. This voltage divider should go via a trimpot, so you can adjust.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2003, 11:11 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
runebivrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Huddinge, Sweden
Send a message via MSN to runebivrin
Break the connection between R5 and ground, and insert a capacitor in the break. Since the resistor values are rather small you'll need a large capacitor to avoid rolloff in the bass, so you might consider bumping up the resistor values by a factor 10 or so.

Then again, I don't think the offset is much to worry about in practice.

Rune
__________________
Do wizards use spell checkers?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2003, 12:47 PM   #7
Optical is offline Optical  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Thanks for the speedy replies guys!
....but i have another problem......

Ok i thought everything was fine, but when i changed the input resistor (R2 = 22k) to a 22k pot my DC offset went from -30mV on mute to +200mV fully open....!!!

I havent tried putting any caps from the 680R resistor to ground as yet..
I also have an input cap placed before the variable resistor, is this the correct place to have it or is it better to have it after the pot from middle pin to the non inverting input of the chip?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2003, 03:35 PM   #8
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Optical, you can calculate the offset. For this you must know:

Input voltage offset
Input bias offset
Used resistor values in feedback and at the input.

If you don't know how to calculate, draw a schematics and I (or somebody else ) calculate it for you. Offset is natural but you can reduce it... or increase it. Your choice.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2003, 03:45 PM   #9
GregGC is offline GregGC  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally posted by Optical
Thanks for the speedy replies guys!
....but i have another problem......

Ok i thought everything was fine, but when i changed the input resistor (R2 = 22k) to a 22k pot my DC offset went from -30mV on mute to +200mV fully open....!!!

I havent tried putting any caps from the 680R resistor to ground as yet..
I also have an input cap placed before the variable resistor, is this the correct place to have it or is it better to have it after the pot from middle pin to the non inverting input of the chip?
The sch you use is good for OPA541 where Ibias are very small and will not be affected by changing value of the pot.

That's a bit better.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...500#post259500

But I would do this:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...525#post259525

This circuit will give you steady DC offset at the out, no matter the position on the pot.
If you want to experiment:
1. omit R1/C1 (HF filter, I'd ceep just in case)
2. Check different res values (keep the ratio the same) like 6.8k/220k and see what the output offset will be. It should be fine.

Mind you I did it and it sounds very good:
Another GC project
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2003, 03:55 PM   #10
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
I have made some calculations:

R3 22k
R5 680 R
R2 22 k

=> Pot at min, 33-333 mV offset

=> Pot at max, AC coupled signal source, 170 mV to over 1 V.

The big problem is that you have a DC-connected amp (no cap between R5 and ground.

I say that your amp can't be good unless:

Insert a cap in the feedback
DC-servo
Offset trim by a pot.

I suggest that you take a good look at page 1 and typcial application in the datasheet of LM3875 (or maybe LM3386 since you used it). Check also AN-1192 from National.

EDIT: I totally agree with ashok below that you should avoid current paths, and sensitive ones through the pot. Isolate the + input with a cap or have at least a pull down resistor. In case of a bad pot you can get bad behaviour of the LM IC. The IC MUST have current to it's inputs.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reducing dc offset on sub plate amp? crippledchicken Solid State 3 6th October 2007 06:06 AM
An Extremis 6.8 Offset Reducing Taper TL Design valveitude Multi-Way 86 28th February 2007 02:43 AM
NIGC input impedance xcortes Chip Amps 2 23rd December 2004 08:38 PM
Got some parts with my NIGC kit that I don't know what to do with TheDriver41 Chip Amps 12 17th December 2004 01:38 AM
NIGC Buffer Assesears Chip Amps 21 2nd September 2004 08:36 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Page generated in 0.11984 seconds (83.18% PHP - 16.82% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio