|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Hello there!
I have just finished a build of an active subwoofer with a TDA7294 chip amp inside. I have connected it to a soundbar I have build also. Inside the soundbar is a 2. order active filter for the sub. Now, my problem is that the output of the subwoofer is very low compared to the soundbar. I would like it to be twice as loud i think. What can I do. Do i really need to add a small amplifier circuit on the input of the subwoofer to make the input signal amplitude larger? Any tips or ideas is appreciated ![]() /Mads |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
You could probably just alter the feedback factor of the power amp. Halve the value of R2 (approx) and double the value of C2
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mississauga ontario canada
|
The RC combination of 22uF and 680R has a 3dB point of 10.6Hz.
For a sub I would have used a 220uF - 680R for a 3Db point of 1 Hz. Or is that just me?
__________________
Doug We are all learning...we can all help |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
@mooley - would it be okay with 47uF and 330ohm? Sounds like an easy fix... any downsides?
![]() @DUG - My sub is not going further down than about 36 Hz (its a small system), so i dont think that is a problem, but i could be wrong?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
There shouldn't be any downsides for your application.
Try and locate those actual components in your amp and we'll take it from there. The circuit I posted is the standard application note. Yours will be similar but may have slightly different values. So see what is fitted. Its just a case of lowering the value of that resistor (whatever it is) and raising the value of the cap in a similar ratio.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Typical recommendation is to set the -3 dB point at no more than one-tenth to one-hundredth of the frequency that you don't want to have any effect on. So, 3.6 Hz or lower. Not sure how much difference it might make.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Well - tried to change the value of C2 and R2 to 44µF (two 22µF in parallel) and 330R, but it has not caused any improvements. (The original values where 22µF and 680R). Bummer!
Any other suggestions?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
If you've identified the components correctly then it must be doing what it should... it can't not do. It is absolutely "cast in stone" that those components set the voltage gain of the amp. In the above circuit the voltage gain is 22K/680+1 which is 32. Your new values are 22K/330 + 1 which is 66.
So what do we do... We prove it (which will make sure the correct parts have been identified). Two minutes of a job to test. A scope or DVM can be used (DVM on AC voltage). 1. Get yourself a test tone burned onto CDR (there are two here in post number #2 if you haven't any. Choose the 120Hz track), A Test. How much Voltage (power) do your speakers need? 2. Connect the DVM across the speaker and set the meter to AC volts. Use a low range for best resolution. 3. Leaving your amp exactly as it is now play the tone and adjust the volume for some convenient level on the DVM. It can be anything that is accurately resolved and displayed on the meter, for example 100 millivolts or 1.394 volts, anything. 4. Write down the result and leave the volume settings exactly as they are. 5. Now, either refit the 680 ohm back in place of the new 330 ohm OR, tack the 680 ohm across the 330 ohm currently fitted. Whichever is easiest. Leave the new cap as it is. So you now have either 680 ohm or a new value of 222 ohm (the two in parallel) in circuit. 6. Repeat the test and write down the new level. Whatcha' got ?
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
I bet you are right - perhaps I just cant hear the difference with the input signal I have tested with. I'll try some other signals tonight, and post what happens.
![]() Anywho - I am absolutely certain of the values as I have made the amplifier from scratch... so I'll give it another go and see what happens. Thanks! |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
OK
![]() If you need even more gain you can go lower on the resistor (within reason). Perhaps as low 82 ohm (and a bigger cap).
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ma Audio Hk-401sx low low output | ivkata | Car Audio | 3 | 5th March 2012 11:16 PM |
| Value of output caps for Aikido - how low is too low? | cbutterworth | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 3rd September 2007 01:34 AM |
| Feedback on low budget subwoofer | noodle_snacks | Subwoofers | 13 | 29th January 2007 05:53 PM |
| how to connect a non powered subwoofer to a stereo system without a subwoofer output | JSD777 | Multi-Way | 4 | 20th September 2005 03:19 PM |
| Low powered subwoofer recommendation | manxam | Subwoofers | 6 | 1st February 2004 12:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |