Is this the right way to Calculate an Transfomer? - diyAudio
 Is this the right way to Calculate an Transfomer?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 15th February 2013, 11:42 PM #1 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Argentina Is this the right way to Calculate an Transfomer? Example 1. Chipamp 70W por channel, if i build an stereo Amp, i need to use something like... Voltage 24-0-24 = 48V AC => 68 VDC - 2 Volt from diodes = 66VDC 140W Power To be safe i need to use 140W x 1.4 = 200VA Amperage = 4.15A So for an 2 channels amp with 200VA will be OK, right? If use one channel instead two (to run mono) can use the half of that values Voltage 24-0-24 = 48V AC => 68 VDC - 2 Volt from diodes = 66VDC 70W Power To be safe i need to use 70W x 1.4 = 100VA Amperage = 2.1A Right? What is the diference in the maths if i use 8ohms, 6ohms, 4 ohms or 2 ohms load?
 16th February 2013, 01:29 AM #2 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Carlisle, England If the amplifier is 100 watts then you need 140VA as 40% of power is lost in the heatsink and 60% goes to the speaker. __________________ Murton-Pike Systems PCBCAD51 pcb design software. http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk http://www.pcbcad51.co.uk
 16th February 2013, 02:44 AM #3 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: California I created an Excel spreadsheet to do these kind of calculations. It is useful for designing a power supply, checking out how a given transformer will perform, and to estimate the maximum power that a class AB amplifier (e.g. a chip amp) will put out for a given power supply. Get it at this link: Free Audio Software! It's called "Power Supply Capability and Design". If you have questions about it, send me a PM or (better) use my web site to contact me. -Charlie
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
 Originally Posted by samsagaz Example 1. Chipamp 70W por channel, if i build an stereo Amp, i need to use something like... Voltage 24-0-24 = 48V AC => 68 VDC - 2 Volt from diodes = 66VDC 140W Power To be safe i need to use 140W x 1.4 = 200VA Amperage = 4.15A So for an 2 channels amp with 200VA will be OK, right? If use one channel instead two (to run mono) can use the half of that values Voltage 24-0-24 = 48V AC => 68 VDC - 2 Volt from diodes = 66VDC 70W Power To be safe i need to use 70W x 1.4 = 100VA Amperage = 2.1A Right? What is the diference in the maths if i use 8ohms, 6ohms, 4 ohms or 2 ohms load?
First, your peak signal voltage level across the load will be:

peak signal voltage = peak rail voltage - p-p ripple voltage - about 4 volts

The "about 4 volts" is for the amplifier itself, usually a Vce voltage plus the voltage across a low-value resistor. Usually 3 to 4 Volts at max power. It might be more than 4 V, depending on amplifier topology. But it probably won't be much less than 3 V.

So assuming 1V p-p ripple, that leaves about 27 V for the output signal peak. The RMS voltage of a maximum-amplitude sine would then be 19 V. RMS output power would be V²/Rload, or i²·Rload.

Max RMS Output Power would be 19²/8 = 45 W into 8 Ohms, or 60 W into 6 Ohms, or 90 W into 4 Ohms, or 180 W into 2 Ohms.

To get 70 W into 8 Ohms,
V²/8 = 70 W
Vrms = 23.7 V
Vpeak = 33.5 V
Vrail_pk = 33.5 + 4 + Vripple_p-p = 38.5 V (if Vripple = 1 V p-p)
Vrms _xfrmr = (38.5 + 2) / √2 = 28.6 VMRS

Rather than taking 1.4 times the needed VA, it would be better to use a factor of at least 3 or more.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Quote:
 Originally Posted by gootee Rather than taking 1.4 times the needed VA, it would be better to use a factor of at least 3 or more.
What does "better" mean in this context? Would an infinitely stiff power supply be "better"? It would also (likely) be infinitely expensive, too. I think the point is to estimate the draw on the PS, and then design one that will sag only as much as can be tolerated while still meeting the necessary rail voltage for the desired power output.

For instance, you can choose a higher rail voltage and allow more sag under load, or you can choose to use a lower rail voltage and demand a stiffer supply. The choice might depend on the max rail voltage that your amp can survive, or thermal dissipation concerns, cost of PS, etc. There can be lots of tradeoffs, so I don't think that there is a good ROT for this, except to model the transformer and PS performance under load.

I know you (Bob) put together some spreadsheets for calculating this kind of thing, and my spreadsheet (linked in my post above) also does this kind of calculation. I have found that in most cases, with a typical "music" signal the transformer can be as low as 1.5 times the maximum power output capability of the amp, given that with music signals the amplifier will mostly be operating at a much lower average power level and demand for high power levels is very short in duration and can be (mostly) supplied by the bank of caps in the PS. Do you find something else with your work?

-Charlie

Last edited by CharlieLaub; 19th February 2013 at 02:15 AM.

 19th February 2013, 02:16 AM #6 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Carlisle, England Its quite difficult to rate a transformer for an amplifier because the current draw isn't constant. The smoothing capacitors take in surges of current at the peak of the sine output from the transformer. This means you can easily take full current from the transformer for short periods. So its not as simple as an amp requiring 2amps taking two amps constantly. Its more likely to take 6+ amps in a surge. __________________ Murton-Pike Systems PCBCAD51 pcb design software. http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk http://www.pcbcad51.co.uk
 19th February 2013, 02:57 AM #7 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Argentina wow, thanks too much! I have an PCB from an rectifier that used with an CT transformer. I have another proyect in mind that dont need +- i just need 0-60V, want to know if is possible to convert or need to use a new PCB, i think that the schematic is similar to this 6*10000uF¸ßµµ¹¦·ÅµçÔ´°å - ¹¦·Å°å - ¹¦·ÅµçÔ´ - öÎ¶¼µç×ÓÍø sorry for the offtopic question, but think that the answer will be not enough hard to create a new post
 19th February 2013, 03:46 AM #9 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Indiana Blog Entries: 1 In post # 4, the Vrms transformer voltage that I calculated, to be able to get 70 W RMS max output power, is not high enough. It only enables about 60 W RMS max, into 8 Ohms. I forgot to account for transformer losses, I think. It's best to use the spreadsheet.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post lithoc Power Supplies 3 10th March 2011 11:13 AM AltecDarpa Power Supplies 1 2nd April 2010 08:10 PM nhuwar Tubes / Valves 17 18th January 2007 02:07 PM jesper Solid State 9 30th October 2004 08:39 PM Hybrid fourdoor Swap Meet 5 22nd June 2004 11:56 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 AM.

 Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Rules - diyAudio Store - Sponsors - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - Opt-out policy

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.