
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
8th January 2013, 12:53 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Germany

Bridged LM 3886
Hello everybody,
I am playing with the idea of using a bridged configuration of two LM 3886 chips for at least 100W/8Ohm mono's. The idea was to implement Peters schematics but with two LM3886 instead of one LM4780. So I started to calculate my power supply using Po=50W and Rl=4Ohm as this is how each of the two amplifiers will be working. As described in the LM3886 datasheet I get Vopeak=20V Iopeak=5A and after that I get Vmax=30V. Now that should make it 30V and 5A, or and my question was : do I need a transformer that has 21Vac in the secondaries and over 150W or 200 or over 300W ? I always was under the impression that 300W for one 100W mono would be a little overkill, I would have taken one 160W for 100W or 200W for 100W but not 300. Where am I wrong in my thinking ? Regards, Stefan 
8th January 2013, 07:19 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

100 Watts into 8 Ohms translates to sqrt(800)=28.28 Volts RMS, or 80 Volts peaktopeak. If you bridge, each amp needs to put out swings of 40 volts peak to peak. If you allow 5 volts of headroom from each rail, that says each amp would need to run from a 50 Volt supply. As a split supply, this would be plus and minus 25 VDC.
The current peaks are 28.28*1.414/8=5 Amps from each rail. However, the average, or DC current is 2/pi times that from each supply, or 3.183 Amps. Thus the power supply must deliver 25*3.183+25*3.183=159 Watts. That a bit less than the theoretical Class B efficiency of 78%, which says the power supply would need to deliver 128 Watts. That difference is due to the headroom we postulated earlier. There are some white papers on these kind of calculations here: Update My Dynaco You might also find some interesting stuff on bridging...BTW, in the GT101, I have pushed it to 200 Watts into 8 Ohms...but don't try that at home, as the fuse isn't really set up to do that long term. Akitika GT101 
8th January 2013, 09:15 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Germany

Ok, so far so good, but what is that about the Vmax National is talking about in the lm3886 pdf ? I got at 25V but they state that I should multiply that by 1.15 because of 15% regulation and 10% high line conditions. That brings me to those 31V. Up until now I would have assumed that I would take those 25V divide that to 1.4 and get the data for the secondaries of the transformator but now I am not sure. Is this only to be used as max voltage for the caps or is this the value from which should calculate the tranny ?
The power supply part was never my best part during college, I always liked to stay within DC and bits and bytes 
9th January 2013, 12:52 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

We agree on the +/25VDC Rails...that's a good first step. So, if regulation were perfect, then that would be the end of the story....But...
Some things make life not so ideal: 1. power supply ripple 2. loss in the diodes 3. IR voltage losses in the transformer 4. line voltage variations Approximate Ripple from i=Cdv/dt, so dv=dt*I/c. On a 60 Hz line, dt=1/120. We'll approximate I as Idc, at around 3 amps...let C=10000 uF...dV=2.5 Volts...so that's 2.5 Volts of droop due to ripple. The diodes have almost no loss (say 0.4 V) at light loads, and maybe 1 volt at heavy loads, so the bridge rectifier takes away about 1 volt from the 25. The IR losses in the transformer are usually hardest to get a handle on...not because it's that hard, but the mfrs. don't usually give very good models. As one example, a toroid that I use rates the outputs as 35035. So the total voltage should be about 70*1.4141=98 volts when lightly loaded. It puts out about 106...we conclude then that the rated voltage is the under load voltage. We'll say that is roughly 10% regulation. Line voltage could be plus/minus 10%. So...if you wanted to end up with +/25 under max load, you'd need the half winding voltage, Vhw, (assumed to be a loaded voltage) to satisfy: Vdc>=Vhw*0.9*1.4141Vripple, so If Vdc=25, then the half winding voltage would be spec'd at 22.4 Volts. Now, under light load, and at high line, you'd have the half voltage of 22.4*1.414*1.1*1.10.4=37.92 Volts. That's ok, since you'd have about 38038. Still, that's a huge difference! 76 Volts (high line, light load) versus 50 volts (low line, heavy load). That's still within an acceptable window on the LM3886. But, if you're trying to get the most out of the LM3886, a regulated supply helps (though there are certainly other ways to attack the problem...everything has its pluses and minuses). That's why in the GT101 I use a regulated power supply. Akitika GT101 As the EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) says about all such numbers, "Your mileage may vary". But I hope that gives you a rough idea of what you're up against. Last edited by djoffe; 9th January 2013 at 12:53 AM. Reason: typo 
9th January 2013, 08:24 AM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Germany

The huge difference is what I was afraid of. Going with 37V rails into 4Ohm that I would have since I am in a bridged configuration is something that is out of the spec as far as I can see. Ok, it is not a continuous state, and the LM is protected and would probably get shut down if this happens over a longer period of time, but it is still pushing it a little.

9th January 2013, 08:32 AM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan

Lm3886 can sound real good untill pushed even just a little bit then things change for the worse very quickley

12th January 2013, 03:39 AM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013

Bridging LM 3886 make sense if you want to have a load of 1632 ohms.
In your case better solution is to parallel 2 chips. As a benefit better heat dissipation. Last edited by Yurka; 12th January 2013 at 03:51 AM. 
13th January 2013, 10:35 AM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Germany

I understood that a parallel configuration is of no use for a 8 Ohm load while it is recommended for smaller loads, i.e. 4 Ohm in order to supply the needed current . Since my speakers are the Start Air Kit 1R I am safe over 8 Ohm, I was thinking that this would be the easiest way to get some more power while dissipating the heat trough two devices instead of one as it would be the case with a LM 4780.

13th January 2013, 12:04 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

Perhaps with the amount of power you are looking for, you are planning for a future set of speakers?
The link that you sent shows that the speakers can take at most 20 or 30 watts. Please clarify... 
13th January 2013, 12:06 PM  #10 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

Oops...my mistake...I see now, you are doing the 1R...rated at 70 to 100 watts...

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Lm 1875? 3886?  aquapiranha  Chip Amps  12  14th September 2009 09:30 AM 
lm 3886  larryg  Chip Amps  6  1st June 2009 07:38 PM 
Using +/70V on a LM 3886  Pery  Chip Amps  17  23rd July 2007 10:58 PM 
LM 3886 bridged  costy_ro  Chip Amps  40  28th April 2006 01:05 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 