50K or 100K pot?

[li_gangyi]

so in conclusion the best bet would to go with 50K Log pots...am i right??

[poulkirk]

Had a look at the circuit above and have a few comments to make about it besides the question about the potentiometer

Firstly, why are two bridge rectifiers used, one connected as a Back to Back Bridge would do

Second, why only 1000 MFD used in the Power Supply Filtering, 4700 or 10000 MFD would be much better

Third, Why use a .22 Ohm Resistor in the Output, a small Inductor, damped by a suitable resistor would work better, and give you a better Damping Factor

Fourth, Why use the Inverting Input on the Amplifier Chip

This effectively places the Potentiometer, (as I understand) a Carbon one at that in the Feedback Loop

Carbon Resistors are no good in Feedback Loops, and will cause a certain amount of distortion

Ordinary Metal Film Resistors are Cheap, and much better

Suggest use the Non-Inverting Input, and use a 10 MFD Bipolar Electrolytic for the DC Coupling, and say a 47 or 100 MFD Bipolar Electrolytic for the Feedback Ground Isolation

Re Potentiometers

I suggest use a Professional 10 K Audio Taper ALPS Conductive Plastic Potentiometer, fairly expensive but very very good

Audio Taper is a slightly modified Log Taper

[li_gangyi]

dude...you mudst be new to the GainClone scene...first 1000uF caps..they are there as they have been found to be the best sounding in this application...too much and the whoile thing becomes bassy...
Inverting input...he wants to build an inverting amp~!!
Carbon resistor...you are right...they do introduce distortion...but since he wants to build a inverting amp...I don't see how he can get rid of it unless he uses a metal film stepped att. network...
The dual bidge rectifiers are there as they have been found to give better performance compared to a single bridge rectifier...and it gives more flexibility...if he wants to use dual transformers...(I dunno why...maybe he doesn't have on of correct voltage)..but a single one COULD be used...tried it and it sound the same to me...(TO ME)...I realise that some of your statements make a lot of sense to a guy who doesn't mess with GCs too much...I'm not saying that I'm a GC pro...( go look for Peter Daniel)...groans...here starts the debate again...but I love debates...

[Squalish]

poulkirk: These values have become a sort of religion, enough people knowing so little about the electronics behind the circuit using the same values that deviating from them is regarded as nearly blasphemic. The ones that do know something do not conduct scientific listening tests, and rely on their own hearing, tainted by the oddly illogical audiophile intuition(which usually includes many superstitions they have picked up along the way to becoming an audiophile, such as the "resonances" of certain case materials).

Even so, it's not that bad of a combination.

I'm making one for myself, inspired by all this hubbub, so what does that say about me? Then again, I AM using more caps, I AM using a regulated supply, I AM using some quite severe modifications, and I'm not under the impression that the gainclone is some highly unique circuit, the engineering of which requires some higher order of knowledge.

[li_gangyi]

I'm not say that a regulated supply wun work...but you do need one that can supply a highcurrent at any given time...or else there might be "compression"...as to the cap values..yeah I also initially thought bigger means better...but seems not to be in the case of a GC...wonder why...perhaps we should ask National on this...