|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
|
Andrew and Danielle,
Are there any PCBs that you guys think have a good layout? Cheers, Jeff |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Some on this Forum.
Some for sale on the web. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mark, have you tried 10k vs 390R instead of 20k versus 1k? The firmer 10k input load may reduce DC offset a lot. In this case, it would be easier to get left and right closer to matching, better for stereo amplifiers.
__________________
♦ Tools & Guides ♦ ClipNipper headroom boost ♦ Parallel LM1875 pt2pt ♦ Easy parallel TDA7293 board ♦ TDA7294 pt2pt ♦ My post has opinion. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Athens
|
Daniel, i tried your suggestion and it worked. But let me explain .
Psu= +/- 37V I have install Rf=22K, Ri=680R Gain set to 33. Rin= 680R Rg=22K Rm= 39K Dc offset = 30mV. I change Rin= 330R Rg=10K everything else remain the same. Dc offset = 6mV. Since I was happy with the result, i didn't try further values for Rin + Rg, but i install a Cm cap of 100uf, as suggested by the datasheet, since i want to use the mute function with a little delay. With the Cm 100uf installed and no other changes Dc offset = 20mV. I try some smaller values for Cm and found that 22uf gave the best results of Dc offset = 4mV. (Rm was 39K) Further degrease of Cm to 10uf result in Dc offset = 30mV. So i kept the Cm to 22uf and increase the value of Rm from 39K to 49K and Dc offset reduced to 1.7mV!!!!! According to the Datasheet RM≤(|VEE| − 2.6V)/I8, Mute pin has to be feeded with minimum of 0.5mA. In my first try I had originaly install Rm= 39K = Im = 0.88mA= Dcoffset = 4mV. With Rm = 49K = Im = 0.70mA = Dcoffset = 1.7mV All the above tests was done with and without Ci = 220uf. Dc offset was the same with and without Ci installed. So the 10K - 330R is a good combination for the input. In addition to that it seems the degrease of Imute current can further degrease the Dc offset. I will try to do the same tests with another chip in order to clarify the results.
__________________
Modesty is the art to make others discover how great you are. |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I think this approach is going to become de rigueur for chip amps ! Makes me consider building one (Daniel has been trying to persuade for awhile).
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I guess the reason this is not used often is because Voffset varies not only with each LM3886 (requiring individual trimming) but also with mute current, temperature, etc.
BTW, I get less than 4 mV output offset on the MiniRef 3886 with a JRC4580 in the outer loop and no other special trimming. |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Just notice that there's a wide variety of resistor selections that could result in a gain of about 33. You're not locked in to the datasheet's suggested 22k feedback resistor.
__________________
♦ Tools & Guides ♦ ClipNipper headroom boost ♦ Parallel LM1875 pt2pt ♦ Easy parallel TDA7293 board ♦ TDA7294 pt2pt ♦ My post has opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Athens
|
Quote:
__________________
Modesty is the art to make others discover how great you are. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Also, you're going to want a speaker protector kit for when the chip has an accident, because you don't want a worn out chip to take the speakers out with it. And, DC coupled amplifiers have a long history of both shorter lifespan and sudden breakage. So, be sure to protect the speakers in some way. The remaining problem of the DC coupled amplifier is one of inferior dynamics, but hopefully you can make up for that in the preamp or buffer circuit, and just helping the source a bit with a buffer could really help level the tone too.
__________________
♦ Tools & Guides ♦ ClipNipper headroom boost ♦ Parallel LM1875 pt2pt ♦ Easy parallel TDA7293 board ♦ TDA7294 pt2pt ♦ My post has opinion. Last edited by danielwritesbac; 1st October 2012 at 08:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I have a little bit of evidence, but not proper and thorough testing, that aiming for a low output offset by balancing all the input pair conditions results in lower output offset drift.
If I can build up an input pair that has an offset of 1mV, then I find it hardly changes over a big range of temperature. But if that same LTP is deliberately mismatched then the output offset drifts a lot more. That mismatching could be any combination of different: Ic, Ib, Vce, Vbe & Tj. But do keep in mind my lack of proper testing !!!! |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DC offset and gain on GC LM3886 | Xerxes75 | Chip Amps | 19 | 9th October 2012 10:02 PM |
| LM3886 - DC offset problem | luis.jimenez | Chip Amps | 22 | 10th April 2010 11:34 AM |
| Feedback capacitor to minimize DC offset | Rafal | Chip Amps | 31 | 15th August 2008 10:22 PM |
| Same old story LM3886 and DC offset | officeboy | Chip Amps | 11 | 24th June 2004 02:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |