|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
29th July 2012, 11:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fanling
|
Drive unit for parallel LM3886
There is a great thread discussing parallel lm3886 which shown that THD is lower.
For two lm3886 in parallel, the input impedance of the chip is lower. Does any consideration need for the driving circuit? In other words, the stage before LM3886 need to have lower output impedance? Thanks. |
|
|
29th July 2012, 01:04 PM
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Typically, zin of the LM3886 (at least in non-inverting configurations) is so much higher than anything that drives it, that no special buffering is necessary.
Update My Dynaco |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| drive unit / cabinet compatibility | sippy | Full Range | 2 | 5th April 2010 01:16 AM |
| Parallel TDA2052 vs Parallel LM3886 for subwoofer | goldyrathore | Chip Amps | 22 | 22nd November 2009 02:34 PM |
| Drive Unit Repair! | Brainticket | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2007 07:54 PM |
| Speaker drive unit repair | PSXmad2 | Multi-Way | 1 | 14th December 2006 12:26 AM |
| Are two separate lm3886 = 2*lm3886 in parallel or bridge mode | rs1026 | Chip Amps | 11 | 21st October 2004 10:24 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
