Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10th October 2003, 07:08 PM   #81
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally posted by apassgear
well adding to the previous post the voltage will be depleated more rapidly on the smaller cap, but that does not make much difference recharging the cap, but will sure make diference on music as you listen to it.

I tried to interprete the graphs by Pedja, and I come to the following conclusions:

Extra ESR (or extra wiring resistance in the xformer, which leads to the same) makes the current pulse "flatter" and thus reduces hf content;

All other things being the same, increased load increases the rippel (of course) and from the fft's I think this increases the hf contents. In the graphs the carrier level drops but the harmonics stay about the same which means relatively more harmonic content.

Do you agree Pedja? How about those graphs with log vertical scales?

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 08:40 PM   #82
Pedja is offline Pedja  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
Here they come, logarithmic Y axis. Cap’s ESR is 0.1 Ohm.


1000uF and 100mA:

Click the image to open in full size.

1000uF and 350mA (certain troubles begin):

Click the image to open in full size.



And yes, finally that interesting fact can be seen below: higher capacitance can make higher noise floor at HF. Explanation goes like “it is made by those short duration pulses (which have wide bandwidth in the freq domain)”.

10000uF and 100mA:


Click the image to open in full size.


10000uF and 350mA:


Click the image to open in full size.


So, as seen above, the second interesting thing is, excluding the bottom end, this 10000uF likes better 350mA than 100mA load.


Again this might not be the technical answer on “why low capacitance supply works?” question. Oh yes, it works. But IMHO it is not the answer. At least, not the whole answer. YAMV*.

Pedja

* your answer may vary
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:01 PM   #83
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Pedja,

did you make you simulation model detailed enough to also
get RF noise from the diodes? That is something that is very
dependent on capacitor size, among other things.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:14 PM   #84
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois, USA
Default time to measure

Pedja,

Thanks for the additional plots.

The next question is what happens when we have a 1kHz or 20kHz signal superimposed on the 120 Hz charging pulses.

Now it's time to measure; I've got a digital scope with FFT at work, so measuring is easier than simulating (for me). My IGC has 2200uF per rail and dual 24VAC transformers per channel. It does have a couping capacitor, so it won't be possible to measure a DC PS drain for a direct comparison to the previous simulations.

Jeremy
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:15 PM   #85
Pedja is offline Pedja  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
Jan,

Extra ESR of the cap makes current pulses lower in amplitude and longer in time. Difference is bigger as it is bigger the drawn current. As you pointed out, added series resistance has similar (though not exactly the same) effect. But generally, noise floor is higher with higher ESR or added series resistance (I am not talking about the noise suppression, it is still only about the noise generation).

I think we all can agree that the career has lower amplitude in the case of the bigger caps and less drawn current. Generally speaking you were right claiming that the excessive large caps can cause HF problems. But as with all the problems in this world, it is the question how serious they are.

Pedja
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:31 PM   #86
Pedja is offline Pedja  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
Christer,

No, that overcomes my current exercise since, if we want to go along that road, it should be modeled transformer as well and possibly should be taken into account some more parasitic phenomenon. I might be wrong, but I restrained here from fast and Schottky diodes and used conventional 1N4007 believing it will minimally mess the thing.

Pedja
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:36 PM   #87
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sector ZZ9 plural Z alpha
pedja: think you could model some parallelled film/lytic caps, based on realistic specs?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:43 PM   #88
Pedja is offline Pedja  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
Well, if you have specs... It could be modeled surely better than it is done by the capacitor as primitive passive element. Good reading here:
http://www.aeng.com/pdf/capacitor.pdf

Pedja
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 09:56 PM   #89
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Pedja,

I didn't think you modelled diode noise, but wanted to check.
It is actually not difficult at all to get such phenomenae in a
simulation. Just adding some inductance to the AC source will
make things happen. However, I really have no idea what are
reasonable values for R and L of the secondaries, so I can't
say how close to reality my experiments are. So far I have only
bothered to see if the phenomenon can be captured in
simulations at all, which is obvoiusly can.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2003, 10:43 PM   #90
diyAudio Member
 
apassgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
Quote:
Originally posted by janneman



Extra ESR (or extra wiring resistance in the xformer, which leads to the same) makes the current pulse "flatter" and thus reduces hf content;

All other things being the same, increased load increases the rippel (of course) and from the fft's I think this increases the hf contents. In the graphs the carrier level drops but the harmonics stay about the same which means relatively more harmonic content.
Well said Jan,

From my point of view, i agree with every word, and not taking in consideration pedja's modeling or testing myself, just as an understanding of this efects on my humble mind.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Page generated in 0.11062908 seconds (80.74% PHP - 19.26% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio