I designed the GC LM3875

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Obviously, multiple amps of current are not going through those 47k resistors! (2.5 Amps RMS, for 50 Watts RMS into 8 Ohms, for example, would cause a 47k resistor to dissipate (2.5)²(47000) = 293750 Watts RMS, and would require 117500 Volts RMS or 166170 Volts peak across the resistor!)

If you look next to (i.e. before) the 47K resistors, there are labels, "IN1" and "IN2". Those go to the output, way on the right, through the speaker protection relay.
 
Last edited:
Obviously, multiple amps of current are not going through those 47k resistors! (2.5 Amps RMS, for 50 Watts RMS into 8 Ohms, for example, would cause a 47k resistor to dissipate (2.5)²(47000) = 293750 Watts RMS, and would require 117500 Volts RMS or 166170 Volts peak across the resistor!)

If you look next to (i.e. before) the 47K resistors, there are labels, "IN1" and "IN2". Those go to the output, way on the right, through the speaker protection relay.

47K Resistance at the ends of the current calculation
35V(OUT VOLTAGE<35V)/47000=0.74MA


It is used, to avoid error protection circuit operation, dc protection.


Recently, I buy from international suppliers to the new quality goods LM3875TF.

It is very convenient to install. Really comfortable effect.

I think LM3875TF better than LM4780 or LM3886.

The influence of the circuit may be 47 lab. May be lower SR speed, more pleasant voice.
 
Last edited:
New for authentic LM3875TF by supplier.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3474.jpg
    IMG_3474.jpg
    308.8 KB · Views: 599
I bought one of these boards a few weeks ago and really like the design. Having the speaker protect and power supply on the same board makes it super easy to hook up and is very compact so it will fit inside some pretty small cases.

I bought the board for just under $20 with shipping. I had some had some chips on hand that I got for free as samples and pulled a transformer out of a junk receiver that I pulled out of the trash. I re used the heat sink and jacks from the junk receiver too so in the end I have very little stuck into this nice sounding amplifier.

What I really like is these amps are sold as a kit with out the main chips so you can buy your own and don't have to worry about getting a cheap clone. You can also choose to up grade any of the parts since nothing is soldered up. Heck, $20.00 is almost cheap enough to buy this for just the circuit board and buy all of your own parts.

Dale P.
 
ljm_ljm.
I am no expert but the 2200 uf capacitors seem small for this much power. Please share your reasoning for sizing these capacitors.

Actually, 2200 uF is fine for on board caps if you use a separate board for the rectifier and some bigger caps. ;)

This approach has a couple of advantages too. It removes heat away from the board (both the caps and rectifier generate heat) and it puts a faster capacitor (the 2200 uF) closer to the amp. It also allows you to use bigger ripple caps (bigger both in value and in physical size).

Parallel caps will have lower esr than a single cap too, which is an important parameter to optimize for this application.
 
Now, I designed "THE GAINCUBE"

Since the first time I saw this little marvel, I thought that it deserves a nice (and different) enclosure.
And this is the result, "THE GAINCUBE".
All made of aluminum 6061, brushed (in process), and anodized (soon).
It uses a 200 VA Antek 28-0-28 transformer, and a 28 step DACT potentiometer.
That's all.

Photos:
IMG_20140406_134228_718.jpg

IMG_20140406_134241_626.jpg

IMG_20140406_134307_393.jpg

IMG_20140406_134321_535.jpg

IMG_20140406_134339_258.jpg

IMG_20140406_134426_263.jpg
 
Actually, 2200 uF is fine for on board caps if you use a separate board for the rectifier and some bigger caps. ;)

This approach has a couple of advantages too. It removes heat away from the board (both the caps and rectifier generate heat) and it puts a faster capacitor (the 2200 uF) closer to the amp. It also allows you to use bigger ripple caps (bigger both in value and in physical size).

Parallel caps will have lower esr than a single cap too, which is an important parameter to optimize for this application.

May be a dumb question but how do you bypass the on board rectifier?
 
Yank it out and hook up the power leads from the power supply board to the plus and minus holes for the rectifier.

Finished my build based on the ljm's PCB. I must say it sounds very nice.
Used an Antek 200VA transfermer with 25V secondaries.

By the way, in order to use an external power supply board you don't use the onboard rectifier and you need to jumper holes 1 and 3 for the rectifier and connect the +V power supply to pin 1. This powers the +V rail and the soft start circuit. Connect -V to hole 4 for the rectifier.
 
The thing that people say about the larger the better,ain't true and setting everyting parellel increase 0ffcourse resonance probs. I allways wondered why guys with subwoofers in their cars , use a couple of farad's. And i doubt if they get a right spectrum.Those sub
pwersupilies doesn't cost a thing .
 
Since the first time I saw this little marvel, I thought that it deserves a nice (and different) enclosure.
And this is the result, "THE GAINCUBE".
All made of aluminum 6061, brushed (in process), and anodized (soon).
It uses a 200 VA Antek 28-0-28 transformer, and a 28 step DACT potentiometer.
That's all.

Photos:
View attachment 410905

View attachment 410906

View attachment 410907

View attachment 410908

View attachment 410909

View attachment 410910
Hi Pemo,
Nice build ☺ how does it sound ?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.