|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#221 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: AREA 51
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Hi Aguilabrava ,
This is how I planned to build my amp. All parts are finished except for the amplifier boards. I need to add some parts of the Thiele network and also a 220 nf capacitor. It is fully remote controlled, but can also be manually controlled. There are going to be 4 inputs. It has a speaker protection against DC current. This protection board also has a switch-on delay to prevent pops and clicks when powering up the system. In the back (left side) you can see the inductors I made myself, just like peranders advised me (post #177). I'm not able to measure the inductance because I have no equipment for this, but I think they will do just fine. |
|
|
|
#223 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
As I mentioned in my last post I'm going to use a speaker protection kit. According to the manual of this kit the speakers should be wired as in the image. Should I place the second part of the thiele Network (the parallel RL circuit). In front of the speaker protection board or after it?
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
The R//L can go before the spkr prot, or after the spkr prot. Both work equally well.
The Zobel half if fitted before spkr prot must go as close to the output pins and chip decoupling as possible. If you fit the Zobel after the R//L, then the Zobel is directly across the Amplifier's spkr output terminals. |
|
|
|
#225 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It is preferable to place both circuits on the amp side of the relay. That way their protective function remains in place even if the relay cuts the signal to the speakers. Oscillation or RF interference may not bother you when the speaker is disconneceted, but that is no reason to subject the amp to either.
You also avoid discharging or recharging the snubber capacitor each time the relay changes state. Voltage and current involved are small, but so is the capacitor and there is no need to age it faster than necessary. Normally at least the snubber will be on the amp board and the protection circuit will be on a different board, so that issue usually solves itself. If you fit the snubber behind the R//L circuit, you go from a 1st order to a 2nd order low pass with a highish Q that may just lead to the oscillation the snubber is there to avoid among other things. It is important to understand that the RC circuit is not a Zobel network, i.e. it is not an impedance correction. The capacitor value is far to small for that. It is an RF snubber. It should be close to the amp, not close to the speaker.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#226 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
The Thiele Network is in two forms.
Form1: R+C across the amplifier output and R//L on the route to the speaker terminals. Form2: R//L on the route to the speaker terminals and the R+C across the speaker terminals. Both these versions work. That is the way Thiele designed it. Cherry followed up with a short paper explaining that there are an infinite number of intermediate versions that span from the two limiting forms that Thiele proposed. I have posted the spreadsheet to allow the two Thiele forms to be calculated and for all the intermediate Cherry versions to be calculated. |
|
|
|
#227 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
This is how I made it.
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, but with different values.
Nice. Where?
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#229 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
When an output inductor is needed???
Download the zip file. It is simply a compressed Excel XLS file. Last edited by AndrewT; 15th April 2012 at 09:35 AM. |
|
|
|
#230 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Echegaray, Naucalpan, Estado de México
|
Hi guys, this is PEMO again.
I found this new board, similar to the ones we bought before. I can see some differences in it. One of course is a Zobel. And the other is an input filter. By viewing these photos can you confirm this? Thanks again, PEMO. IMG_0123.jpg IMG_0054-1.jpg |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hi, New member just bought k272a kit from Oatley | Jack5 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 22nd February 2011 01:31 PM |
| Cheap LM3886 PCB I probably shouldn't have bought. | crash42 | Chip Amps | 17 | 21st September 2010 06:53 PM |
| Just Bought a Zaph 5.5 kit... first DIY | Humboldt_g | Multi-Way | 7 | 29th August 2010 02:16 PM |
| Bought the kit, now I need parts | systemerror909 | Class D | 2 | 5th December 2006 05:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |