|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Our audio world is currently heavily biased towards a voltage driven world (so it is hard to find stuff that fits into a not-voltage drive system), but voltage drive has some serious issues that current drive solves... the big ones being using the speaker's impedance as the reference resistance in the voltage to current conversion, and back EMF.
It is true that with a current amp the impedance curve of the loudspeaker is reflected in the FR curve, so one needs to have a flat curve (damping in the speaker and crossovers that aren't as evil as most -- or no XO at all), or one that is the inverse of the speaker's FR when driven by a voltage amp. With a loudspeaker suited for current drive one can achieve greater DDR. The easy way out is to multiamp -- use a voltage amp in the bass where is is sometimes really hard to kill the system resonance, and current amps elsewhere where one can limit the bandwidth to the flat part of the impedance curve. It can be really eye-opening to hear what happens when you play with the output impedance control of a variable tranimpedance amplifier. Every speaker seems to have an optimum setting. Particularily if you have speakers that are sympathetic with higher output impedance amplifiers. oon, i encourage you to push forward, all too often the nay-sayers are blindered by the current lopsided prediliction for voltage drive... it may make it easier for the marketers to keep things simplier for the vast majority of customers who could care less about how it really sounds (steam-rolling some very important options for those that do) . One has to always consider that the speaker & the amp have to be considered as a system. By making commerical speakera and commerical amps more or less suited to voltage source, any amp or any speaker can be mixed and (sorta) have something that is close to a system. Leaves out some very important options for those that want to achieve all that is possible. A pivotal pointin my audio education was talking with an old Western Electric engineer who couldn't understand why anyone would build an amplifier that did not have output impedance of the amp = to the loudspeaker impedance ... makes one start to think. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
Quote:
Anyway to answer your question: none of the above. I'd go for a design with variable output impedance. How can you resist a knob on the front of the amp that let's you change the output impedance while it's playing? Wonderful for experimentation. Anything else ties you down unnecessarily, IMO. Quote:
P.S. Here's a nice paper by Malcolm Hawksford about current drive: DISTORTION REDUCTION IN MOVING-COIL LOUDSPEAKER SYSTEMS USING CURRENT-DRIVE TECHNOLOGY Lots more of Hawksford's published work can be found here: Malcolm Hawksford - Publications |
||
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
The best one so far (that i've heard) started out life as a driver amplifier for the electron gun in a CRT. This is a good one too. The Secret of Tube Amplifiers Revealed - and much more! I recommend the book. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Hi Godfrey,
The f2j is unfortunately my castle in the air at the moment. The other factor is my woofers are not 100db/w drivers, a lot less than that, so I am looking for a current source chipamp to complement it... now I realise, that prob current source is probably not the best thing if a majority of the bandwidth is around fs... Oon Oon Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the lengthy reply. I am inclined to take your advice. Current amp for the full range and voltage amp for the bass. I am very inclined to in the direction that Klaus suggested too. A resistor and a coil in series to tune the output impedance. I prob should have posted this somewhere else, if I guessed where this thread is going. I thought that using a chipamp is an easy way of getting a current source. But the technique that Klaus described is very intriguing because I could just buy a preowned AV amp with 7 channels of 100w to do it. In fact I was thinking about using the coil as a bass booster... simply treat it as a low pass filter at somewhere near fs, and I could achieve the 6 db / octave boost... Oon Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help understanding current sourced common emitter/source amplifiers | GregH2 | Solid State | 9 | 26th February 2011 06:14 AM |
| using one source with two amplifiers | spendorspain | Parts | 1 | 26th January 2008 09:33 PM |
| Aleph-type current source, but source follower this time | tschrama | Pass Labs | 4 | 29th July 2005 12:55 PM |
| Source follower electret mike -> use with current source? | capslock | Solid State | 1 | 28th February 2003 12:54 PM |
| R21? and Current Source AC Current Gain | macka | Pass Labs | 9 | 20th May 2002 08:58 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10467 seconds (88.12% PHP - 11.88% MySQL) with 11 queries |