|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You have two issues. One is that the amps input bias current is connected to the potentiometer. As any current through a resistance produces a voltage drop across it, you get varying DC voltage as you turn the potentiometer. The solution for this is to use the input cap between potentiometer and amp, and to use an input resistor to ground that provides a stable path for the bias current to ground.
Now your non-inverting input has a fixed DC offset and you need to make sure that this is not amplified. For that purpose you need another capacitor in the feedback loop, which is called Ci in the datasheet.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I doubt that 32 mv on the output will be any cause for concern. Just think about it
how much power would that be into a 8 ohm speaker ? Just for fun do the math and I think you will agree. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I'll do the maths for you.
32mVdc into 6r0 (assumed DCR) is ~0.17mW Maximum amplifier output is assumed to be 28.3Vac (100W into 8r0). Normal average listening level is ~1W allowing for a 20dB overhead for unclipped transient peaks. A quiet passage during that listening session could be 20dB below your 1W average and the S/N ratio down there would be just 0.17mW/10mW = 17.7dB The 32mV offset, when thought of as a noise source, is only 17dB below a quiet passage on a normal recording. Very quiet passages or lower than 1W average listening could easily bring the wanted music signal to a level that is lower than the offset voltage. Yes, the amplitude of the quieter passages in the music can be considerably lower than the displacement due to a 32mVdc output offset.
__________________
regards Andrew T. Last edited by AndrewT; 25th January 2012 at 06:53 PM. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Leersum
|
Before you think where is hè gone? I am still here but because of my illness it is not my week so to say. But i am reading your Posts and i am thinking about it. I also ordered some things on THE internet. So that i van try THE things you mentioned.
I can't wait |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Will it destroy the amp or the speaker? No.
Will the DC offset be audible? No. Will it have audible effects? Yes. It will displace the woofer or full-range speaker from its center. Excursion will not be symmetric anymore, leading to higher distortion from the speakers. It will not displace the other drivers in a passive multi-way speaker, because the crossover will filter DC components out for them. The woofer will be misaligned in relation to the other drivers, producing phase shifts, leading to a more rippled frequency response around the crossing frequency, if you don't redesign the crossover. The smaller the woofer and the higher the crossing frequency, the worse is the effect. It heats up the woofer coil, leading to power compression. As a result the woofer will produce less SPL for the same voltage, making it quieter than the other drivers in a multi-way system. Again the crossover needs to be adapted to the new situation.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Leersum
|
So until now if have the following:
Is everything in the right place Yes Place a log potentiometer An Alps 50k is going to be placed Increase the resistor R3 (680=original) Trying different once starting at 1k Place a coupling cap Laying around are some 2mfd ones Buy speaker protection Ordered the ones from EBay Place the feedback cap at the Ci position These came with the kit I will put them in place From one of the technicians off a high end audio store I got a tip to place to Allen and Bradley resistors to middle the input... A circuit is coming |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Leersum
|
I dismantled the hole thing and put I all back together with the writing above.
And it works!! The dc offset is now 0.1 that is mV... The problems with the gain are also sort off over. The problem now is that the amp has is bit to low on gain and it sounds a bit dull. But it is all detailed. Mmmhh perhaps a few tweaks will do.... |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
The volume pot will suck tone. Get rid of it unless you need it. Most sources will have a volume control.
It's not worth the loss of tone unless you really need a volume control. For future reference, the higher ohm pots will suck less tone, but will still suck tone nonetheless. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DC offset issues with GC | fishski13 | Chip Amps | 18 | 17th November 2009 12:33 AM |
| How to measure DC offset on lm3875 GC | Bedi | Chip Amps | 6 | 10th November 2009 02:29 AM |
| DC offset problem from noninverted GC | 5150ed | Chip Amps | 8 | 16th August 2006 04:39 PM |
| DC Offset on a BrianGT GC | cantskienuf | Chip Amps | 1 | 23rd July 2004 02:23 PM |
| GC very low DC offset | matjans | Chip Amps | 7 | 22nd September 2003 10:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10183 seconds (80.12% PHP - 19.88% MySQL) with 10 queries |