|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
I am building 2.0 and building active crossover first time. So how is my schematic ?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Filters for HF and LF look a bit low-Q. Oh and the sub seems to have a high-pass characteristic - don't you want low-pass?
<edit> Oh, looking closer seems its band-pass. But also very low Q. Download LTSpice and sim it.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Thank you, " Filters for HF and LF look a bit low-Q " Should I replace 10nf with 22nf ?
for subwoofer : 4.7uf & 2.7K is high-pass to remove very low frq. 4.7K shelving low-pass resistor. Should I change the values ? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
No, just changing the cap values won't alter the Q - you need to apply a bit more positive feedback if your aim is to get a Butterworth response. Same with your sub's bandpass - its all first order sections.
You could have a play with this online calculator : Sallen-Key Low Pass Butterworth Filter Calculator
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Thank you but I am not much expert to run the calculator.
I was copying Project 123 Sub-Woofer Controller |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Ah but those stages have higher Q because each opamp has those 10k/10k resistors to the -ve input giving a 6dB gain - yours has unity (0dB) gain. So if you're going to copy it, you'll need to copy it more closely.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Is this as per your advices ?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Yep, the tweeter and woofer filters now have the correct Q. You can simplify the sub circuit too if you want as you've made it fixed frequency and the original was variable.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
" you've made it fixed frequency and the original was variable."
If You mean to say VR1 & VR2, I think it is for variable gain. or what ? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
The article suggests its for customizing the bass response according to your particular system. Its not a gain control as it varies the time constants of the integrators (those are the opamps with 100nF feedback caps).
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active Crossover | kctess5 | Multi-Way | 0 | 18th December 2011 11:46 PM |
| Passive crossover into active crossover | hahfran | Multi-Way | 16 | 10th February 2008 06:16 PM |
| L-R active crossover ? | AndrewT | Multi-Way | 1 | 22nd September 2006 05:55 PM |
| active crossover | aaronboumans | Analogue Source | 4 | 31st May 2003 04:59 PM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09224 seconds (76.22% PHP - 23.78% MySQL) with 11 queries |