|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Finland
|
Hi all! I'm an electronics noob getting started in the world of DIY audio. Well, that's not completely true, I built a pair of 2-way speakers around 10 years ago to which I chose the drivers and designed the crossovers for. My knowledge is however limited in the area of electronics but I'm eager to learn!
I stumbled on the T-amps and decided to build one. I've ordered parts for a TA2020 amp (schematic based on the datasheet and mods from the Lepai thread) and I thought about assembling it on stripboard first but after a few layout designs I started considering designing a PCB instead. So, I just got started with Designspark PCB using a one-layer design and the first issue I faced was pad/hole sizes for the chip and other parts. First I made standard pads for the IC but when I tried to route the CSW caps the Design Rule Check started complaining about spacing between the pads and the traces: Quote:
![]() So I started playing with different sizes and I found a few default alternatives: - Large Via - Pad - Small Via - SMD Pad - Via I noticed that by using Small Via (0.8mm pad, 0.4mm hole) and 0.4mm trace I didn't get any errors. What I want to know now is how big the (standard?) holes should be (for the chip and other components) and how wide the power and signal traces should/can/could be. ![]() I'll surely have a lot of other questions as I go along. Are there any recommended resources on the web for what I'm trying to learn (basic PCB design for audio amps)? edit: And yes, I'm probably goind to use smaller decoupling caps and place them underneath the board but the questions are still valid for the other components. Last edited by frasco; 29th November 2011 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
frasco
A quick look at the TA2020's datasheet shows that each pin is 0.022" wide. The holes should be just a bit larger to allow an easy fit (say 0.027"/0.7mm). The soldering pads should be large enough to allow a 12mil trace to pas near them. If the routing software has an "auto" soldering pad diameter I'd suggest you leave it that way. The distance between this trace and the soldering pads should be no less than 12mil. This will ensure a trouble free PCB manufacturing. Now about that PCB design for audio amps. Bare in mind that this one is no ordinary amp. This one is a digital amp so a digital routing techniques apply! Regards, Venci
__________________
MY DIY AUDIO BLOG |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TA2020 PCB review | yakideo | Parts | 3 | 25th April 2011 10:06 PM |
| New MKIII Tripath TA2020 PCB 25watt Class-T amplifier | dayu | Class D | 6 | 16th September 2010 04:20 PM |
| FS: Arjen Heldar's 3 x Tripath TA2020 PCB = 6 channels total with integrated SMPS | Galgo | Swap Meet | 3 | 7th August 2010 02:17 PM |
| Tripath 3 x TA2020 PCB | maurycy | Swap Meet | 6 | 4th February 2010 01:31 AM |
| 6 channel TA2020 finished amplifier PCB (setup for 12V) | maurycy | Swap Meet | 2 | 27th February 2009 05:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07498 seconds (75.69% PHP - 24.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |