Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th November 2011, 01:18 PM   #1
epilot is offline epilot  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default PCB preference of putting 2 components to a trace

Hi guys,

I have got an important question when I was trying to implement the PCB of a pre-amplifier based up on 3 stages of TL074 op-amp chip:

Is there any rule saying the preference of 2 components connected to one trace? I do not know if I am clear or not, but I'll try to explain my mean by an example. for instance in an inverting op-amp one pin of the Rf is connected to one pin of Ri, so do I have a freedom to connect either the Ri's pin first to the "-" input of the op-amp or the Rf's pin first when designing the PCB? what about the other lead of Rf and the load's pin?
Is my mean Makes sense?

Thanks a lot
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2011, 10:30 AM   #2
epilot is offline epilot  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
No response please?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2011, 10:39 AM   #3
Mooly is offline Mooly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Mooly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Always best to draw what you mean but [think] I understand...

In your example it makes no difference. The theoretical aspect is that the print resistance will add in such a way as to modify the gain... but is rf/ri+ say 0.001ohms going to make a difference. Of course not. And depending on whether its the rf or ri end of the PCB you connect to means the gain could go either way depending... and its a non problem. Think of each conductive trace on a PCB as a resistance and you won't go far wrong. This is where many designs fall down with interaction/hum issues, and its so easy to get right. You just have to think, and its good that you are
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------
A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2011, 11:32 AM   #4
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
Further to Mooly's comments, placement is critical in PCB design, generaly the small amount of resistance added by a trace is negligable...but they also add a small amount of inductance, this may be problematic with RF interferance. This can be a problem where you have high impedance inputs such as the feedback pin of a lot of voltage controllers.
The calculator from this site is a PCB designers best friend:
PCB Via Current | PCB Trace Width | Differential Pair Calculator | PCB Impedance
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 01:20 PM   #5
epilot is offline epilot  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooly View Post
Always best to draw what you mean but [think] I understand...

In your example it makes no difference. The theoretical aspect is that the print resistance will add in such a way as to modify the gain... but is rf/ri+ say 0.001ohms going to make a difference. Of course not. And depending on whether its the rf or ri end of the PCB you connect to means the gain could go either way depending... and its a non problem. Think of each conductive trace on a PCB as a resistance and you won't go far wrong. This is where many designs fall down with interaction/hum issues, and its so easy to get right. You just have to think, and its good that you are
Hi Mooly,

thanks a bunch for your reply,

Actually It is not so simple for me to show the PCB with the components so that could explain waht I mean, So I use a simple schematic for a Smoothing cap and the load so that I show you what I meant.
I do not know why I think that in the B circuit there is a problem and the load would not be smoothed Just right because the upper side load is much near tan the bridged diodes instead of the smoothing cap, I myself think that the upper side of the load would not receive the correct DC voltage which is generated or smoothed by the cap because the unsmoothed current from the bridged diodes FIRSTLY goes to the load instead of going to the cap to be smoothed and then go to the load SO it does not get the proper time to be smoothed PERFECTLY (maybe I am wrong and I think that I am but thats what I see..). Is it makes sense to you?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg A.jpg (10.8 KB, 118 views)
File Type: jpg B.jpg (11.1 KB, 120 views)

Last edited by epilot; 17th November 2011 at 01:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 01:28 PM   #6
epilot is offline epilot  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by marce View Post
Further to Mooly's comments, placement is critical in PCB design, generaly the small amount of resistance added by a trace is negligable...but they also add a small amount of inductance, this may be problematic with RF interferance. This can be a problem where you have high impedance inputs such as the feedback pin of a lot of voltage controllers.
The calculator from this site is a PCB designers best friend:
PCB Via Current | PCB Trace Width | Differential Pair Calculator | PCB Impedance
Good software marce, Thanks for sharing it, do you know another one more too?

Actually I would like to know the formulas that explain the relationship of the dimensions of a trance with the inductance/capacitance plz. Can you help me out in this regard plz?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 01:36 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Hi!

I think there is no universal answer to your initial question. It depends on the application / component.

In the particular case of the power supply you are showing, what you want is (indeed) to have the lowest resistance between the cap and the load, so you'd rather have the cap as close as possible to the load.
besides, the trace between the rectifier and the cap will act as a RC filter, so will provide better smoothing.

Note that we're talking mOhms or less here, so in the case of a power supply, it will not make a big difference in real life...

If you're designing for RF, then yes there is some optimisation to make.

In many cases, to get a "feel" of what is better, just imagine the traces are resistors or inductances (try to think extreme cases where traces have a farily high resistance) Then it will make it very obvious what is best on the PCB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 01:39 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
The earth loop must be avoided for stability.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2011, 01:43 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
I don't see a ground loop in this particular example ...?????
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2011, 12:09 PM   #10
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
Epilot, in your case B is not good practice, and where PSU smoothinbg caps are concerned we work to the rule that the PSU output goes through the smoothing capacitor first (A) always without exception, for both linear and Switched mode PSU's. This is done mainly for EMC and noise purposes, you are minimising the loop for the ripple by doing this (and also the switching loop for SMPS,s), amonst other benefits. I would make it one of your design rules and never break it. On SMPS we use the minimum copper we can get away with through that node, ie the route is not much bigger than the pad. This smoothing capacitor must be near the power supply, not near the load, the other way (ie near the load is WRONG).

Impedance calculator basic, I have a Signel Integrity and High speed router add on for my PCB package wich calculates all these figure for me, but use this one when I need to work out the basic topography at the begining of a design.
Microstrip Impedance | Electrical Engineering Tools | EEWeb

Oh and heres a creepage and clearance calculator as your playing with mains.
http://www.creepage.com/

Last edited by marce; 18th November 2011 at 12:12 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PCB Trace widths Mark245 Solid State 19 7th July 2009 09:13 PM
PCB Trace Clearance for High Voltage Bengali Tubes / Valves 3 12th November 2007 03:12 AM
PCB Trace Width Current rating?? Zero Cool Everything Else 9 21st November 2004 07:48 PM
non os for cdp without pcb trace cutting Bernhard Digital Source 16 20th April 2004 03:58 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.11592 seconds (81.09% PHP - 18.91% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio