|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Here is the next in the series:
The Voltage-Regulator-Chip Amp family welcomes a new member: It is a (relatively) efficient class A single ended stereo amplifier utilizing the correlation between L and R channels to improve efficiency. This one is a really top-class amplifier, boasting less than one ppm THD! Have fun!!! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I don't believe it.
It being the predicted performance as shown by the simulator. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Here are some news:
I have built a prototype, and it works brilliantly. I just had to add a stabilizing network, R10/C1. I'll be back soon with pics and measurement results. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Here are pics of the prototype.
I haven't made any measurements yet. But I used it as headphone amplifier, to check that the SE efficiency scheme had no negative impact on real audio signals. I don't know whether I still have any bits of brain left inside my skull: the thing puts out 2.5W/ch. Sheer madness. Anyway, the results look good: even when there is a strong stereo differentiation, there are no discernible negative effects, and the separation remains perfect. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
It looks superbly simple.
I think I will try it on HP as well. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ruhrgebiet
|
Quite interesting and low parts.
What is the gain of the circuit? Is it possible for you to make some measurements and post the results here? THX. 1543 |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
The gain is set by the outer (Global) NFB loop.
R4/[R6+C3] + 1, ~11times in the passband. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Here are some test results. Unfortunately, my poor old ST1700B didn't let me go very far or deep into the measurements.
At 1KHz, the THD indication was the same as the noise floor of the distortion-meter itself: 0.0012%. The residue on the oscilloscope did show some second harmonic, buried in the noise of THD-meter, but it was insufficient to influence the reading on the meter. I can safely say that the distortion (at full power, just before clipping) is <0.001%, and probably significantly lower (but probably not as low as in the sim). The power bandwidth extends to ~30KHz. Beyond, the waveform breaks down, probably due to insufficient SR. The small signal bandwidth (@2Vpp output) is 140KHz. The opamp was a LF353. All the measurements were made with both channels in service and loaded with 8R, and receiving an identical signal. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ruhrgebiet
|
Impressive results from a LM317/337.
What about using this circuit for a bridge mode amplifier? This would avoid possible performance decrease due to strong differentiation of stereo Signal. To still achieve the efficiency advantage by correlation is all to do to replace the lm317 with lm337 for correlation? 1543 |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
In SE class A, the current source determines the peak output current. With the 317's, that's what limits the output power on 8R (bias=800mA, ~half the max current of the 317). By bridging, you could increase the output power, but on a load larger than 8R. Not very convenient. There is another path to use the correlation: instead of the middle 317 used as a current source with a relatively low voltage across thanks to correlation, you could adopt a complementary scheme: The middle regulator would be modulated by the L+R signal, and one of the channels and outputs would have its polarity reversed. I will probably try this scheme too, but it's a bit more complicated to implement. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| And now, the Regulator-Chip JLH Amp. | Elvee | Chip Amps | 17 | 10th February 2012 04:58 AM |
| The Voltage-Regulator-Chip Amp family welcomes a new member: | Elvee | Chip Amps | 9 | 14th November 2010 08:52 AM |
| More class D madness | Sch3mat1c | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 27th April 2010 06:52 PM |
| Which way to choose: Comparisons Chip/Class D/SE DHT ? | WE91 | Chip Amps | 21 | 18th May 2007 07:48 PM |
| new class T chip amp | DJNUBZ | Class D | 1 | 17th October 2005 10:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |