|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
|
I constructed the Bridged-Paralleled GainKlone using the attached circuit. I have built the inverting and non-inverting amps as individual amplifier units/stages. I am unable to parallel two opamp units, may it be the inverting amps or the non-inverting amps. However, bridging with one inverting and one non-inverting is ok. All individual units function nicely.
With paralleling of amps, current drawn is very high, as high as 3+ampere for one channel at no load. I suspect that there might a circulating current flowing between the paralleled amps. In the attached circuit, feedback resistors are RC55 - 0.25W 0.1% the rest of them are 1% Metal Film but hand matched. The 0.5ohm 2W output resistors are actually two 10hm 1W 5% parallelled together, again hand matched. The readings I am getting from the amps, as an individual module, are as follow, @1kHz Non-Inverting AMP1 AMP2 Peak-to peak voltage = 42 42 V RMS = 14.89 14.92V Average = -165 to -180, 17-35 mV Inverting AMP1 AMP2 Peak-to peak voltage = 42 42 V RMS = 14.89 14.92V Average = -118 to -140, 33-53 mV I wonder if the differences in these readings is acceptable. Which of these resdings should I pay more attention to? Has any one enounter this problems as well? How should I go about solving this problem? Please Advice. Thanks & Regards, Yeo |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
I suggest that you read the application note AN-1192 and also thread here
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...884#post224884 The chips aren't very suitable to run DC-connected. Better to lower the offsets through a DC-servo or a cap in order to be able to reduce the 0.5 ohms resistors. They ruin the damping factor. They should be as small as possible.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
The million dollar question then is how Jeff Rowland does it on his power amps using LM3886s in series/parallel to get away with no servo on sight and 0.5 resistors at the output, as you can check on photos shown on this DIY Forum. Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
Other than that - yes, I think the chip's need individual Offset trim or DC blocking Capacitors per chip in the Inverting input link - 4u7 * 4 should do it. In addition however I'd also worry about the 2k5 Input impedance. The whole circuit is totally cockeyed like Trenco's Aether and should not work well, so hence it does not.... Excessive simplicity is as bad as excessive complexity. Make all things as simple as sensible, but no simpler.... AND NEVER simplify for reasons of cost, unless you are in the business of making money from HiFi gear.... Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
I may need to have a buffer stage before these amps as the input resistance is really too low. Have to see how it goes first. Thanks Yeo |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LM3875 Bridged and/or paralleled | Scribble | Chip Amps | 2 | 22nd October 2004 08:42 PM |
| Gain of Bridged-Paralleled Gainclone Vs. Regular NI GC | PHilgeman | Chip Amps | 0 | 2nd July 2004 02:48 PM |
| Bridged and paralleled (not in the same design) question | Adam M. | Chip Amps | 4 | 15th February 2004 03:50 PM |
| gainklone problems, maybe... | cowanrg | Chip Amps | 44 | 25th February 2003 05:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |