Lack of bass with LM3886 - Page 3 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th April 2011, 11:13 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Hello,

I am not using the optional Ci cap to obtain stronger bass. Am I wrong ?

The small blue decoupling caps of the kit have been replaced by MKP Wima of the same value.

Here is a picture of my temporary trial :

DSCF0003ter.jpg

Bye
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2011, 03:28 AM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
digits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
heatsinks way too small mate, if your chip fries, so does your speakers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2011, 03:46 AM   #23
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi Mailard, the optional Ci cap does not increase bass, it will actually reduce it at lower frequencies, if it is too small in value the rolloff will start too early potentially lowering bass output.

It is used for protection purposes, As a capacitor will not pass DC it will cause the amplifier to have unity gain at DC therefore if you have say 20mv DC on the input it will give 20mV dc on the output. Without Ci if you have 20mV dc on the input you will get 640mV dc on the output (the gain of this amp is around 32 times).

As you don't have a coupling cap on the input, this is a big concern, you must only connect components that you know to have very low dc on their output.

However we can discount Ci as being the source of your lack of bass.

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2011, 06:40 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Could it be SPIKE kicking in during stronger bass and reducing the output because of the small heatsinks.
__________________
Tyler
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2011, 07:17 PM   #25
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
Quote:
Originally Posted by maillard View Post
I was about to upgrade the caps of the PSU to Munsdorf 15000 microF/18mohm instead of the Panasonic 10000 microF/36mhom.


While the Panasonics are definitely not my favourite caps, they do not appear bass-shy. As for the 3886, opinions vary. I have heard tolerable bass using very sympathetic speakers but with others bass has been clearly lacking. Not at all sure if any changes in the components will have sufficiently big effect. Paralleling may. Getting less bass than an anemic 3020 is indeed disheartening.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2011, 10:22 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Hello,

Since the last post, I have used larger heatsinks. The result is significantly better, the sound being now well balanced.

Thank You for the help .

I'd like to experiment two modifications to see if I can obtain more :
1) 20000 F / rails,
2) 10000 F / rails + LM338 regulated PSU

What do You think ?

Bye.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF0011_small_2.jpg (187.5 KB, 497 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2011, 05:37 AM   #27
gootee is offline gootee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Blog Entries: 1
What size bypass caps do you have directly across the chipamps' power pins? You might try experimenting with the sizes and types of those, especially with some electrolytics. They act as a point-of-load power supply that doesn't have the inductance of the supply rail conductors to slow down the response to the chip's need for changes in the current drawn, and to generate rail voltage dips and spikes when a chip's current draw tries to change.

I see that you haven't twisted together the wire pairs. You might have all types of strange things going on, in that case. Twist every pair of wires tightly together. Also add some RF filtering (even just 220 pF directly across the + and - signal input pins of each chip).
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2011, 07:16 AM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
ByronInPortland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Lightbulb One more suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by maillard View Post
The transfos are 2X24v AC which gives +/- 35 V DC. After one hour, the heatsinks became a little hot (I will says 40 C max).
According to the ChipAmp instructions, your secondaries of 24V with +/-35VDC are at the upper limit of the ideal rail voltage for 8 ohm speakers, and above voltage recommended for lower impedance speakers. This is consistent with your finding that increasing heatsinks improved the sound. I very recently finished the same kit, only I'm using a single power supply. I also did not get creative, but did everything according the the instructions (I opted for Ci) but I'm only using 2X18v secondaries, and I'm getting excellent bass from 4 ohm speakers.

It's probably not worth the effort because you seem to have solved your problem, but with other projects consider lower rail voltages with this chip.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2011, 08:31 AM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Hello Gootee,

I have 100 F panasonic FC + 100nF MKP Wima. (values of the kit)
I can easily make a try with 100 F more of the same type.

For the RF filtering, you mean 220pf in parallel with the (100F + 100nF) ?

Thank You.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2011, 01:05 PM   #30
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Spike and some of the other protections built into the National chipamps are designed to vary their limits depending on chip temperature.

Increasing the dissipation capability of the assembly will reduce on chip temperature and could lead to less intrusive limiting.
This may give the impression of less treble content which your brain interprets as more bass in the balance.

I wonder if conjecture has any basis in the science?

I run my chipamps cool and follow my own advice to using double the dissipation that National recommend as the minimum.
I find that the 3886 plays adequately well using 88dB 8ohm speakers at background and average levels.
The sound deteriorates rapidly as SPLs are increased above average. I suspect the cool running Spike and protections are limiting the transients creating this horrible louder noise.
__________________
regards Andrew T.

Last edited by AndrewT; 24th May 2011 at 01:09 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LM3886 bass amp thomasst Chip Amps 14 17th August 2012 11:22 AM
Active RIAA lack off BASS wabun Analogue Source 1 5th October 2010 08:33 PM
Class-D lack of sustained bass Myth Zero Cool Class D 15 9th July 2009 06:41 AM
lack of bass in a 6h30 design SunRa Tubes / Valves 3 31st January 2007 10:54 PM
Flat bass of paralleled LM3886 manuruthen Chip Amps 7 26th August 2005 09:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2