|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
hi there,
some weeks ago i built an om3886 amp. previously, i used a sonic impact t-amp which is now replaced by the gainclone. bass response is way better, and the overall sound ist more clear. what i liked better about the t-amp is that its sound was more natural, the gainclone seems to be a little bit sterile, and i want to improve that. my source is a computer with an m-audio delta audiophile, speakers are markaudio alpair 10 full range drivers in a bass reflex enclosure. please have a look at my layout (there is no star ground because i use ground layers, which can't be seen in the screenshot) and my schematic (i forgot the value of c5 and c6, which is 100nF). The amp is absolutely quiet, no audible hum is present. the 22000µF capacitors are relatively large, but i used a snubber circuit. i wouldn't like to change these to smaller values because i don't want to loose the tight bass. so my question is, how can i get a more natural sound? what do you think about a tube preamp, any suggestions for a cheap and easy circuit? is there anything i should change in the circuit? all parts i used are cheap standard grade, nothing audiophile. the transformer used is a 2x18V 160VA toroid. diodes are mur860. should i replace the cheap open volume pot for an alps? thanks for your suggestions! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Riga, LV
|
Hi,
One option would be a placing of triode before the LM -it would add a good Harmonics
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How do you define more natural? What is actually missing?
More harmonics are one way to create a different impression, but certainly not a more natural one.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
it's hard to say, perhaps natural wasn't exactly the right word, let's just say the gainclone sounds more sterile. I had the impression that music seemed to be more 'alive' with the t-amp.
i've never heard a hifi tube amp, but i know tube sound from my guitar player years, and i am interested in learning more about diy hifi and trying out some things, so my first guess was a tube preamp. then i thought about optimising my gainclone circuit at first, so i decided to start a thread over here and ask for improvements. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Adopt star earthing rigorously, disconnect your groundplane from all grounds except the star point.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
use a preamp,it will "colour" your sound
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You should remember that any tube stage other than a cathode follower will have gain. Too much in fact . Like a 6922 with resistor anode load and in a grounded cathode mode with unbypassed cathode resistor could have a gain of about 20dB ( x 10 ). That will make the overall circuit too sensitive for typical DAC outputs ( maybe about 0.1 Vin for full output !). Dropping gain with resistors isn't the best solution. Maybe a tube with less gain?
But if you can sort out the gain issue then a tube preamp would be nice. I'd stay away from a cathode follower if possible. The 3886 appears to sound best within a certain 'gain' setting. You could experiment with that ( lower it ) ! ![]() "....use a preamp,it will "colour" your sound ...." Yes of course, any input stage will. However either that 'colouring' shouldn't be too 'obvious or nasty' or it should sound 'nice' . AND you should use such a stage only if you are trying to solve some problem. Always remember that 'good sound' is what YOUR ear tells you , not necessarily what someone else tells you !
__________________
AM Last edited by ashok; 26th February 2011 at 01:19 AM. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Use those optional components and try it again. Use star grounding. Keep the resistance of the feedback path to around 20K. Check your filter setting.
You seems asking for a more dynamic sounding amp.... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You first have to find out what produced the effect of liveliness you perceived in that class D amp you used before. The main suspects are frequency response and distortion.
Changes in the frequency response of a class D amp are likely to occur when the speaker impedance is not linearised and adjusted to the load the output filter was designed for. In that case the amp’s output filter probably produced that impression of liveliness by boosting high frequencies. Add the same output filter your T-Amp has to the output of the LM3886 and see, if the sound becomes similar to test, whether that was the case. Distortion in a class D amp is a different issue. Just like in class A amps there is usually no crossover distortion. But often you see that THD peaks at high frequencies which could be another explanation for lively sound. Tube amps create liveliness by high odd harmonics. They also boost certain frequencies, usually the extreme highs, if the speaker impedance is not linearised, and always the range around the woofer resonance, because it is too expensive to linearise. This may not improve the impression of liveliness, but you should consider increasing the Ci values. And you should absolutely add the Zobel circuit at the output.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I see no RF filter, no output Zobel, no supply rail decoupling, no DC block on input.
The supply rail decoupling does not go at the PSU. It is attached as close to the chipamps' Vcc & Vee pins as possible. The gain is ~20x (100k/5.2 + 1). Do not make it any lower. Higher might sound better. I see that there is no attempt to control output offset. What is the output offset? Does it vary when you move the volume control? Does it vary when you plug in and remove the Source interconnect? Does it vary when you turn your Source OFF to ON?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Possible improvements for Aleph? | kenpeter | Pass Labs | 72 | 10th June 2009 11:15 PM |
| Small 50C5 Amp improvements | targeteye | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 4th August 2008 04:46 AM |
| VSC Amp, Looking for Sonic Improvements | Don S | Solid State | 0 | 31st December 2007 10:57 PM |
| amp improvements | felixx | Solid State | 0 | 6th January 2007 07:56 AM |
| Improvements | lplateaudio | Pass Labs | 3 | 19th June 2006 04:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.38202 seconds (23.71% PHP - 76.29% MySQL) with 11 queries |