|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New delhi
|
Hi,
![]() Its my try to make a DIY PCB. Schematic belongs to Carlos FM. Its single sided PCB. need suggestion for improvements if required. Thanks.
__________________
Neeraj |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I saw this in some other thread. Are you double posting?
There too, there was no link to Carlos' schematic. And no schematic nor trace layout for this proposal. How can you expect any sensible comment?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New delhi
|
Quote:
Hi AndrewT, This is made by me only. I am not posting it twice in this forum. And sorry for not attaching the original schematic.Here it is. Made on Express PCB waiting for comments ![]()
__________________
Neeraj Last edited by neeraj; 12th July 2010 at 01:09 PM. Reason: Traces Attachment |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
More of a question really - I can't really see what the point of the 1.5nF and 0R47 snubber networks is. The fact that the 0.47ohm resistors are 1W rated seems to suggest there's going to be a fair amount of RF to soak up yet the 1.5nF is spec'd as an MKT. As far as I'm aware these have significant series inductance which will successfully block any RF from reaching the resistor.
If you're serious about soaking up RF above 50MHz on the supply, you'd need to use, say, a bunch of WIMA FKP02 100pF polypropylenes in parallel - this particular value has an SRF close to 200MHz. Or alternatively use SMT C0Gs. Oh, and I'd split the 1R 10W resistor into two 0.47s and use the first where the 1R is now and the second between the two 10,000uFs. I think two RC filtration stages in series will be quite a bit better than one.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New delhi
|
Hi abraxalito,
![]() If i have understood it correctly i have to use 2 x 0.47/1watt accros the each 10000 caps instead of single 1e/10w used before two caps. As i have mentioned earlier that the schematic is solely done by Carlos FM & the result is posted on Nukk and vikash chauhan's website. Hence i have just prepared a simple DIY single sided board to use it with my chipamp based on schemetic by carlos.. I just want to know that is the layout is correct or not. Thanks ![]()
__________________
Neeraj |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Hiya
![]() Quote:
For me though, its important to get the schematic optimised before considering the layout.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
So it's your choice whether you want to discuss that, and learn something in the process or stay with how it is. jd
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New delhi
|
Quote:
Hi abraxalito Please don't take me wrong. i've never think about it.Your valuable suggestion are welcome & the purpose of posting the layout in this forum is to get suggestion & guidance from persons who have deep knowledge about the same. kindly suggest the required improvements.
__________________
Neeraj |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Also the snubber part of the circuit doesn't look so well thought out (though I will point out here I have little experience with snubbers). It looks to be to absorb high RF frequencies (I deduce this from the lowish capacitor value, 1.5nF), but won't be likely to do that unless the right capacitor is specified and its layed out correctly. I will have a look at your layout later and make some suggestions.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
||
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
It might be useful to reference the original thread on this design...
The (high-cap.) unregulated PSU for chipamps |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PS decoupling cap placement | Klimon | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 24th November 2008 06:06 PM |
| Carlos regulated PS pcb | antomas | Chip Amps | 0 | 18th May 2005 03:21 PM |
| PS cap placement/type | Bryan | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 11th June 2004 02:24 AM |
| PS Cap to V- larger than the Cap to V+ | GregGC | Chip Amps | 4 | 1st June 2004 01:50 PM |
| ps cap significance | Mark Hathaway | Pass Labs | 2 | 14th October 2002 10:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11585 seconds (83.64% PHP - 16.36% MySQL) with 11 queries |