More funs with LME49810

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Here are some ideas for playing with LME49810. The conventional compensation cap is connected between Comp and BiasM pins. This is shown in the left most figure. Output NPN/PNP is connected to Source/Sink pins. We can omitt the LME49810 internal buffer as shown in the second figure. Output PNP is directly connected to the collector of the VAS, BiasM pin. I have not tried this.

We can connect the comp cap across Comp and Sink pins as shown in the third figure. I did this without seeing major issue. Need more test for performance evaluation.

We can also insert a resistor between Bias_M and Sink pins to bootstrap VAS collector. This is from D. Self's Amplifier Handbook Fig 5.4 f. I have not tested it yet.

Any comment?
 

Attachments

  • 49810 conventional.JPG
    49810 conventional.JPG
    78.4 KB · Views: 1,016
  • 49810 buffer omitted.JPG
    49810 buffer omitted.JPG
    72.2 KB · Views: 980
  • comp at buffer output.JPG
    comp at buffer output.JPG
    73.9 KB · Views: 954
  • bootstrapped D Self.JPG
    bootstrapped D Self.JPG
    72.9 KB · Views: 933
With the buffer omitted you essentially end up with an LME49811.

Note that the compensation scheme changes depending on the configuration. I'd definitely be careful and preferably run an open loop gain/phase measurement before committing to a final circuit.

Good thoughts, though.

~Tom

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your advice. How do you do open loop measurement? I tried the scheme given in Self's amplifier handbook.

Panson
 
open-loop gain and phase of LME49810

I used HP3577A to measure the open-loop gain of 49810. The chip was in inverting mode. INPUT R of 3577 was connected to the inverting input pin. INPUT A of 3577 was connected to the output. Note the dynamic range of 3577 is 100 dB. It limits the accuracy of low frequency measurement where the open-loop gain is over 100 dB.

The left picture shows the measured data for 10 pF cap connected across Comp and Bias_M pins. The gain at 10 Hz is about 108 dB instead of 120 dB. This is due to dynamic range limitation of 3577. What is more important is the crossover frequency at which the loop-gain is 0 dB. The feedback resistor network (240R, 5k6) gain is - 27.7 dB. Loop-gain 0 dB is equivalent to open-loop gain 27.7 dB. The corresponding phase shift is 109.5 degree. Hence, the phase margin is 70.5 degree. The crossover frequency is 2.29 MHz.

The middle picture shows the open-loop gain for a comp. cap of 32 pF. The phase margin is slightly increased to 86.2 degree. The crossover frequency is reduced to 709 kHz.

The third picture is the open-loop gain with a 10 pF connected across Comp and Sink pins. The phase margin is 86.6 degree. Crossover frequency is 2.22 MHz. Compared to case 1 (10 pF), we have a better phase margin and similar BW.
 

Attachments

  • 49810 10 pF single-pole.JPG
    49810 10 pF single-pole.JPG
    171 KB · Views: 816
  • 49810 32 pF single-pole.JPG
    49810 32 pF single-pole.JPG
    78.2 KB · Views: 143
  • 49810 10 pF Comp and Sink pins.JPG
    49810 10 pF Comp and Sink pins.JPG
    86 KB · Views: 120
Last edited:
open-loop gain of LME49810 with two-pole compensation

The two-pole compensation consists of 10 p, 5k6 and 56 p. The measured open-loop gain is shown in the left picture. We can clearly see that the gain in high frequencies is increased substantially. Compared to single-pole, gain at 20 kHz is increased from ~65 dB to 85 dB. Note the measurement was the chip alone.

Middle picture is single-pole (10 pF) open-loop gain for up to 10 MHz. I show it here for comparison with the open-loop gain given in the data sheet.
 

Attachments

  • 49810 data sheet open-loop.JPG
    49810 data sheet open-loop.JPG
    43.4 KB · Views: 119
  • 49810 10 pF single-pole extended range.JPG
    49810 10 pF single-pole extended range.JPG
    66.7 KB · Views: 97
  • 49810 two-pole 2.JPG
    49810 two-pole 2.JPG
    68.1 KB · Views: 120
49810 open-loop gain

I fine tuned the measurement. Better result is obtained. The open-loop gain for single-pole (10 pF) is shown in the left picture. The middle is two-pole (10 pF, 5k6 and 56 pF). The right one is another two-pole (10 pF, 5k6 and 151 pF). These three are the gain of 49810 alone.
 

Attachments

  • 49810 10pF single A3.JPG
    49810 10pF single A3.JPG
    82 KB · Views: 114
  • 49810 two-pole 10p 5k6 56p.JPG
    49810 two-pole 10p 5k6 56p.JPG
    80.8 KB · Views: 89
  • 49810 two-pole 10p 5k6 151p.JPG
    49810 two-pole 10p 5k6 151p.JPG
    82 KB · Views: 93
LME49810 with ThermalTrak open-loop gain

With two-pair ThermalTrak connected as output stage (MJE15030/32 driver), the open-loop gain was measured. No dummy load was connected.

Left: single-pole with 10 pF comp. cap
Middle: freq response of single-pole with 10 pF com. cap (inverting)
Right: two-pole with 10pF, 5k6 and 51 pF

The addition of output stage introduces zeros and poles in very high freq region (> 5 MHz). As show, the two-pole case has higher gain in the audio band. For instance, it has over 80 dB at 20 kHz whereas single-pole case is about 65 dB. The two-pole compensated amp should result in lower THD in that band. It will be verified next.
 

Attachments

  • 49810+TT 10pF single-pole.JPG
    49810+TT 10pF single-pole.JPG
    76.4 KB · Views: 102
  • 49810+TT 10pF single-pole Freq Respone.JPG
    49810+TT 10pF single-pole Freq Respone.JPG
    76.8 KB · Views: 103
  • 49810+TT two-pole 10p 5k6 51p.JPG
    49810+TT two-pole 10p 5k6 51p.JPG
    79.5 KB · Views: 104
Last edited:
Hello Panson!

Did you ever get some results with the tpc? How about stability?

Did you ever try bootstraping as shown in pic 4?

How about bootstraping from the PA output?

BR,
Dag

Hi Dag,

Yes, I made a 49811 amp with TPC. No oscillation was observed.

Here is THD comparison for SPC and TPC.

Bootstrapping has not been evaluated. :eek:

Panson
 

Attachments

  • THD+N vs freq 123W 8Ohm.JPG
    THD+N vs freq 123W 8Ohm.JPG
    113.9 KB · Views: 138
Hi Pansson!

Did you hear any differens between SPC and TPC? Distortion is so low so maybe it is hard?

Bootstraping; well you can´t do everything:). But it is intresting because some people (like the latest Dx amp) use bootstrap + current source.

: D
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.