|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
I finally got around to trying the 4-transformer low-flux PS Kuei proposed. The GC in question is 3875 inverted with just 2 resistors and no input cap. Initially a 160VA toroid was used per channel. The transformers i ordered are 100VA EI with dual secondaries which feed dual bridges. I compared the toroid to a single EI (not very fair powerwise) and to two EIs per channel with primaries and secondaries connected in series. Still haven't included dc blocking in the primaries.
The results in my system are a bit controversial. The toroid, as in past experience, produces the fastest and clearest mids, good dynamics but obvious congestion at higher volume and weak and inconsistent bass. The single Ei doesn't give the impression of being less powerful even at higher volumes (my transformer winder claims he's very conservative with the ratings); the sound is a bit slower with a nice deep bass and good depth layering and probably more listenable long term. The combination of two series connected transformers initially showed promise with its ability to efficiently move air. It has slightly overblown bass with good depth, a nice and steady soundstage but very distant mids and generally slow and uninvolving sound. This may have something to do with the low flux but previous experience shows this often to be the result of going over the top with the VA rating. I also tried 4x12v/7ah batteries and while sounding great with acoustic music, on a wider selection the bass sounded disjointed and lagging from the rest, seriously screwing PRAT. I think the problem is not inherent in batteries but relates only to acid batteries, or even to particular makes, as i use NiMH in my MC stage with great results. Incidentally my 'normal' amp is a way-over-the-top PX25 SET with 3 PS per channel. peter |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
were they new or fairly new ? how large were the bypass caps ? and excuse my ingorance but what is PRAT ? my guess would be precise rhythm and timing but this abreviation is new to me. cheers mike |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Hi Mike
Relevant questions indeed. The batteries are out of my UPS, fairly used but charge up to full capacity. Sorry, forgot the make, certainly not Yuasa or Panasonic. The bypass caps are simply the caps i use with the mains PS - 2x1000uF/chip BG. The character of the sound with batteries is slightly reminiscent of what you get if go overboard with the supply caps. Smaller batteries might sound better. Make no mistake though, the sound with batteries may be stunning on simple acoustical music, especially vocals. If girls with guitars is what you listen to mainly, batteries are great. You're very close on PRAT - Pace Rhytm and Timing - a popular term in turntable-talk. cheers peter |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I understand you are talking about this PS. Which diodes did you use? From what you mentioned, it seems like using transformers separetely may actually produce better sound than series connection?
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Peter
That's the circuit which started me. I used MUR860 in a bridge as i didn't want to experiment with too many variables at the same time. Surely full rectification wil sound different to bridge - less switching noise from the diodes but more stress on the caps - may well be better. I might try it first in a preamp as it seems to make more sense with less current. My observations about the sound may only be relevant in the context of the particular transformers i use. Kuei seems to recommend this circuit with toroidal transformers and the results may well be different. All this is pretty inconclusive...sorry. cheers peter |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I also have 4 EI transformers and I might try it one day too. Although I did not try batteries yet, I got the feeling it may not be the ultimate solution either. The 4700u electrolytics in a pic above are low voltage, 10V or so should be fine, right?
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
The diodes limit the voltage across the caps to 1.4v. I still haven't tried this circuit. It will probably have a more pronounced effect on toroids than on EI and while some of this effect will no doubt be beneficial you'll have to cope with an extra cap colouration. it will be great if you give all this a try.
cheers peter |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My 2nd Gainclone. | samsagaz | Chip Amps | 28 | 9th October 2008 04:29 PM |
| Freebird + Gainclone = "integrated" gainclone? | bikehorn | Chip Amps | 9 | 5th January 2006 03:07 PM |
| gainclone as sub amp | tube 300 | Chip Amps | 2 | 13th August 2005 08:16 AM |
| Desert Island Auditions | Mos Fetish | Multi-Way | 4 | 27th June 2003 02:52 PM |
| gainclone vs P3a | AJ Bertelson | Solid State | 2 | 2nd May 2003 07:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |