|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#71 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That's interesting Mike, thanks. I don't think I've seen anything like that before. Is that basically a buffer inside of the feedback loop for the first stage? One thing I really don't get is the 49.9R basically jumpering the buffer stage.
__________________
AJ |
|
|
|
#73 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
two 50 Ohm esistors are making sure the output current divides equally between the 2 op amps - a way of doubling the output current
I'd use a genuinely high output current op amp in a multiloop composite CFA op amps designed for A/DSL line driving make excellent outputs for audio line levels |
|
|
|
#74 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
Hi Stormrider,
Yes, it's kind of a "poor man's" buffer. I needed a little more current drive capability for the three active filter inputs than a single LM4562 could deliver and didn't want to mess with a separate buffer chip or discretes, plus there are already two Opamps right there in the chip ready to use. The 49.9 ohm resistors are there to equalize the output currents from each chip so they won't "see" each other's outputs, and because they're both in the feedback loop, only penalty is slightly reduced output voltage. It works really well, sounds good. Mike |
|
|
|
#75 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Cool. Like I said I've never seen anything like that, but then I've only been at it for a few years now.
The DRV134 has more than enough drive capability for what I need, so I'm good with the circuit I'm working with now. They are kind of expensive though, ~5$ea at mouser, but not bad compared to signal transformers.
__________________
AJ |
|
|
|
#76 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Come on guys, this has got to be far from an ideal design. I know there is room for improvement. I'm open to ideas.
__________________
AJ |
|
|
|
#77 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
What do you consider "ideal", what are you trying to accomplish?
Mike |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| can I use this transformer to power the opamp based preamp? | zome | Parts | 3 | 16th June 2009 11:27 PM |
| A couple basic questions on opamp I/V | NeoY2k | Digital Source | 6 | 13th November 2008 11:55 AM |
| Considerations about opamp based preamp | Tolu | Solid State | 10 | 12th September 2008 01:10 PM |
| Yet another Opamp based regulator | banana | Power Supplies | 4 | 22nd January 2007 02:46 AM |
| Opamp based preamp, for a gainclone | Bricolo | Solid State | 5 | 9th March 2003 05:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08650 seconds (74.34% PHP - 25.66% MySQL) with 11 queries |