Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st December 2009, 09:47 PM   #651
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I found the LT1677 to be a little bit forward maybe, but with smooth sounding treble, and full mids. Minute detail resolution was simply great (better than the OPA211, leading to a better sense of ambience too).

However, after some switching, I did come to the conclusion that the LT1028 is the better choice if an all-round great sounding opamp is desired..

Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
well, yeah...atm I'm in the market for a balanced/High-Def op-amp to feed the burson w/ a very clear DAC output...1124 on its own is boring.
Wouldn't that be precisely the LT1028?


BTW, I don't know why but on the socket I did also perceive the LT1028 as sounding just slightly thin. The funny thing is that after removing the socket, this mild sense of thinness (perhaps just transparency) has completely gone away... Maybe it was partly thanks to the final addition of that 100uF Rubycon ZLH, or maybe just that my ears have been purificated by the constant use of the LT1028...

Last edited by Andrea:; 1st December 2009 at 09:52 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 09:49 PM   #652
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
in comparison, 1028 is too "thin"(maybe my circuit is really made for low GBW, I won't deny it!), and sounds a lot less lively. 1124 has the holographic 1364 SS w/o its distortion
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 09:57 PM   #653
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
in comparison, 1028 is too "thin"(maybe my circuit is really made for low GBW, I won't deny it!), and sounds a lot less lively. 1124 has the holographic 1364 SS w/o its distortion
It's possible that the LT1028 isn't very symbiotic with your circuit. But, if I were you, I'd try to leave it in for a few days, and get used to the new and different sound. Maybe you just have to adjust yourself...it happens.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 10:00 PM   #654
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
too thin-sounding and not High-Def enough...ahhh, 1124 is pure bliss

if the next contenders don't convince me, this one will be soldered on the board(w/ cardas eutectic solder )
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 10:04 PM   #655
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
too thin-sounding and not High-Def enough...ahhh, 1124 is pure bliss

if the next contenders don't convince me, this one will be soldered on the board(w/ cardas eutectic solder )
OK, if it makes you happy... I guess it has a right to. But I don't buy the story that the LT1028 is less high definition than the LT1124, or anything else made by LT for that matter
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 10:18 PM   #656
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
try it, tell me
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 11:17 PM   #657
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
maybe tomorrow I'll swap the burson for two 1028ACN8...just as a reality check, I find those "IC's sound better than discrete" statements dubious to say the least
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 11:41 PM   #658
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
LME49722MA made my ears bleed, literally....statements dubious to say the least
This is all a put on, isn't it?

These two sockpuppet/trolls carry on at will and Glen and PMA get bin time.
__________________
Pain is never permanent

Last edited by scott wurcer; 1st December 2009 at 11:52 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 11:52 PM   #659
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
this is me w/ the 49722MA: Click the image to open in full size.

we'll miss ya scott, you've been so helpful so far...come back soon

Last edited by leeperry; 2nd December 2009 at 12:02 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 12:14 AM   #660
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
And you call this endless number soup of bulldada helpful?
__________________
Pain is never permanent

Last edited by scott wurcer; 2nd December 2009 at 12:26 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
-: Best audio OpAmps :- audioPT Parts 57 13th October 2011 02:47 AM
The Best Sounding DUAL opamps mudihan Chip Amps 214 1st May 2011 06:09 PM
best sounding Tx for sub 10watt class A audio amp? mondogenerator Solid State 2 2nd October 2009 06:21 AM
Help the Idiot: Simple, Great-Sounding Integrated Amp Designs SRMcGee Tubes / Valves 7 15th September 2005 07:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Page generated in 0.14189 seconds (73.57% PHP - 26.43% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio