Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th November 2009, 09:17 AM   #141
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I feel that I have a little gem of a DAC now.


I'd still like to buy me a Poppulse PCM1796 DAC, just for the fun... and because I have many noble opamps yet to use, like my two browndogs with 2 (each) LT1028ACN8 on them
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 09:38 AM   #142
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea: View Post
I remember the OPA-Sun V2 to be nice, meaty sounding... but somewhat colored, not very differently from the LT1363. One opamp that always imposes its interpretation.
yep! like majkel said...it only plays one song, but it plays it really well.

SS is amazing, but there's definitely some tonal nuances this simply cannot reproduce..sounds like something's muffled/missing
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 09:41 AM   #143
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
yep! like majkel said...it only plays one song, but it plays it really well.

SS is amazing, but there's definitely some tonal nuances this simply cannot reproduce..sounds like something's muffled/missing
Who's this majkel?


I don't call them nuances - to me it has an apparent personal sonic signature, mainly tonality wise. It kind of sounded yellow - even more than the LT1363.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 09:48 AM   #144
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Nevertheless, it's the Audio-GD opamp I liked the most. The others were even more imperfect (haven't tried OPA-Moon). But they all distort too much for my taste... If I wanted distortion, I'd go for the nice sounding LT1363.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 11:07 AM   #145
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
On head-fi they're currently talking of the $90 OPA128SM that given its cost should make miracles... They make me laugh some truly genuine lauughs.

Let me count how many modern opamps I could try with that amount... LT1028, OPA1611, AD797, ADA4898-1, AD8597, ADA4627-1, and on...
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 11:38 AM   #146
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
ahhh, I've put back the 1364

sun v2 was too dual-mono to my taste and felt crippled somehow...1364 has an holographic stereo SS, it's more stereo coherent and mind blowing in movies. Earth amplifies it into stellar territory.

well, I'm expecting a new burson w/ a mundorf cap...from what Slash47 says, it's even better than Earth as final buffer on my soundcard. time to find out!

Last edited by leeperry; 7th November 2009 at 11:49 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 12:03 PM   #147
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
The LT1364 is nice. I'm still of the opinion that you should try the LME49723.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 12:13 PM   #148
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
well, it's SOIC8...and browndogs have crappy design(low EMI shielding) so they can't really be used in a PC case.

I'd have to order those higher grade adapters from HK...and well, the"LME" serie would be a nocebo for me

BTW, I plan on using DIP8 single op-amps on adapters...and possibly keep the Audio-GD extension leads, so I'd have to add decoupling caps to avoid oscillating I guess?

and I want four *******' AD797BN...just can't locate any reseller.

Last edited by leeperry; 7th November 2009 at 12:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 12:18 PM   #149
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
No please...avoid using the extension with the regular chip opamps. The Audio-GD seem to work even-with-those-extensions just because they're slow and appear to be compensated to be very stable. I don't dare to imagine what would happen if you try them with the LT1028 or the AD797...


I must insist that a Browndog is far, far less a problem than those extensions with those unshielded flying individual wires. Also the LME49723 is not that fast, 17 MHz instead of the 55 MHz of an LM4562. It will work quite well... and sound equally good.

Edit: Also the AD8599 (10 MHz) would be fine in your application... though the LME49723 would have lower THD.

Last edited by Andrea:; 7th November 2009 at 12:20 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 12:23 PM   #150
Mooly is offline Mooly  
diyAudio Member
 
Mooly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Andrea, can I ask, are you doing any measurements (at a basic level) such as how well each opamp performs with say a 10khz squarewave applied and looking very closely at the rising and falling edges of the waveform ?

IMO you MUST optimise the circuit for a given device

Just an observation, that's all.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Sounding DUAL opamps mudihan Chip Amps 169 18th March 2010 07:08 PM
best sounding Tx for sub 10watt class A audio amp? mondogenerator Solid State 2 2nd October 2009 05:21 AM
-: Best audio OpAmps :- audioPT Parts 45 27th October 2007 05:14 AM
Help the Idiot: Simple, Great-Sounding Integrated Amp Designs SRMcGee Tubes / Valves 7 15th September 2005 06:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Page generated in 0.08405900 seconds (71.76% PHP - 28.24% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio