|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#101 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
well it doesn't bring vocals upfront at the first row like the LT1364, in that respect vocals are more mixed within the SS...but I'm totally hooked to this severe vocal emphasis anyway ^^
I still rest my case that you need a better DAC/amp w/ more swappable op-amps..I currently use 2 dual op-amps for the -/+ polarities of each channel from the AK4396, one more dual op-amp for bringing the stereo output to line out level, and then one high gain JRC4580 for headphones driving. there's no way in hell one dual op-amp on its own would give me this SQ, don't expect the impossible.. |
|
|
|
#102 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Would the AK4396 be a better DAC chip than the CS4398? I don't think so.
I have a DVD player (modified) which uses an AK4385 (still 24/192), and it sounds good but doesn't come near my DACs. I think that the tonal fidelity (the ability to reproduce the natural timbres of sounds) of the CS4398 (and other Crystal DAC chips), coupled with an ability to give a natural weight to sounds, is really hard to match... surely the AK4385 didn't come close in these fields. For the opamps on the DAC output... well, ideally, less is better! It merely makes the search a bit harder. But give me an LME49723 and I claim myself happy... |
|
|
|
#103 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
all I can say is that it won many awards and has been called the "miracle DAC":
6moons audio reviews: ModWright Transporter Quote:
Quote:
![]() and the JRC4580 is really awesome to drive headphones, in a high gain set up that is. Last edited by leeperry; 5th November 2009 at 12:03 AM. |
||
|
|
|
#104 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
The Teac Esoteric CD/SACD players and DAC's use either the CS4398 or the AK4397, successor to the AK4396...and now there's the AK4399, 32-bit resolution...
Also, I don't understand your convictions regarding opamps... When an LT1364 alone corrupts (because it does) the sound more than an LME49723, how could the addition of a further corruption (OPA-Earth) ever improve things... You're just being lucky that LT1364 and OPA-Earth are accomplishing two opposite forms of corruption that tend to cancel each other... but the loss of transparency in passing through 2 opamp stages can never be restored... |
|
|
|
#105 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
hehe, well I don't need 32bit at this point...besides it's not being used on soundcards yet.
well, I'll compare the 1364 to the 1028acn8/1363 on single>dual DIP8 adapters, time will tell whether these will be any better! I'm not convinced that I have the best combo in the world, maybe I'll prefer Sun V2 over Earth...but so far it still sounds amazing. well comparing one LME4972x to the LT1364 doesn't make sense to me, especially when the 1364 is amplified by a discrete op-amp afterwards. "corrupts"? is that a new verb to say "give a hi-fi color"? I've tried the LME49722MA because it carries the lowest THD rate available from National...hahaha, gimme back THD will ya
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
No no, when I say "corrupts" I mean musically, not measured. I just think that the LME49723 (not the LME49722) sounds better than an LT1364, or an OPA2132P, etc...
That said, I have determined that the LT1028 is what reconciles accuracy and musicality the best so... I hope I can stay with this and not be tempted anymore! ![]()
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Right now it reproduces the Jayhawks' "Hollywood Town Hall" so wonderfully...
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
yes, it's heavily colored...with a CRAZY euphonic sound, the LT1364 should be called the "magic" op-amp
![]() ok, looking forward to the LT1028ACN8 then! well, my current combo plays "The Rolling Stones - Aftermath (Japan.MiniLP) (1966)\01 - Paint It Black.flac" amazingly well, everything's perfect! stereo separation, vocals, bass, drums, sitar
Last edited by leeperry; 5th November 2009 at 11:22 AM. |
|
|
|
#109 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Colored but also a bit unresolving. The LT1363 is better at that, but still much behind the LT1028CS8.
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
you need to try LT1028ACN8 anyway...and you know that ^^
also tried AD8599? well you need an in-between clinical and colored...I'm very much not looking for that 4972x clinical/dull character. I very much enjoyed the tubey sound of the OPA2132P as final buffer, the Earth is like an OPA2132P on steroids....some highly detailed slightly tubey sound, perfect to my ears
Last edited by leeperry; 5th November 2009 at 01:05 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| best sounding Tx for sub 10watt class A audio amp? | mondogenerator | Solid State | 2 | 2nd October 2009 06:21 AM |
| -: Best audio OpAmps :- | audioPT | Parts | 45 | 27th October 2007 06:14 AM |
| The Best Sounding DUAL opamps | mudihan | Chip Amps | 6 | 5th July 2006 05:54 PM |
| Help the Idiot: Simple, Great-Sounding Integrated Amp Designs | SRMcGee | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 15th September 2005 07:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15686488 seconds (80.22% PHP - 19.78% MySQL) with 11 queries |