Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th November 2009, 04:31 PM   #91
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
well, I think I'm only gonna go 2*single DIP(1028ACN8/1363CN8) on adapters instead of SOIC8 chips on browndogs...these adapters just stink IMO, at least in a PC case...they catch EMI like you wouldn't believe.

I'll use a bunch of additional DIP8 sockets to rise some of them, if need be.

these adapters look much better: 10pcs Dual SOIC to DIP-8 Convert PCB Adapter SMD OPA627 - eBay

he clearly says that browndogs suck

DIP8 is much better shielded anyway...now I need good quality adapters, the hunt begins!
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 05:58 PM   #92
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Have you seen my adapters?
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 05:58 PM   #93
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Are you saying that the browndogs work like antennas, while those 10 cm (or so) long extensions of the Audio-GD opamps don't?

I have no problems using browndogs, personally. BTW, the DIP8 and SOIC packages are equally unshielded from the outside world.

If interference is such a problem for your application, the LME49720HA should by far outperform anything else... no?

Oh, anyway, do try the LME49720HA soldered on the dedicated browndog. I would swear it wasn't just my imagination when I thought that with the proper TO99 adapter in between (not grossly sticked on a DIP socket) that chip sounds better..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 06:12 PM   #94
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
well I've asked Kingwa, and he said that he's added caps to avoid oscillation and that the op-amp is properly shiedled to ground anyway.

I can't honestly hear any nasty artifacts...but for the hell of it I've ordered twice shorter extensions(5cm instead of 10). I've also enabled Spread Sprectrum on my mobo, so that helps too.

the issue is the poor shielding and general design of the browndogs...read that ebay ad, he's pretty clear that he tried to do things better.

yep, I did try the 49720HA(bent ), and well, what is there to say? it's like a 49720NA with better bass?

as majkel put it: Audio-gd discrete op-amps reviewed: OPA-Earth, OPA-Moon, OPA-Sun v.2 - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio
Quote:
LM4562 – just a lesser version of the LME49720. Its midrange is on the warm-bright side instead of neutral, overall good and rich presentation, unfortunately too obviously defined hence predictive and limited sometimes.
I've grown tired of that LME sound, it sounds artificial, trebles are whiney..the SS is just dull, the SS on the 1364 is very natural and on the Earth it's full 180 degrees..or maybe a bit more actually, that's what a friend of mine thinks anyway
Quote:
Originally Posted by peranders View Post
Have you seen my adapters?
got anything like these by any chance? Single-to-dual Op-AMP Adapter - DIP version (p/n 021001)

Last edited by leeperry; 4th November 2009 at 06:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 07:57 PM   #95
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I don't think that the LME49723 and the LME49720HA sound all that artificial. Especially the LME49723. I hope also the LME49725.


The LT1363 is very good but I don't know, sometimes it doesn't have that ultimate definition. The LT1028 has that ultimate definition - but, you know, sometimes it doesn't have that relaxed presentation.

My best hopes are directed towards the OPA1611 and the OPA1612...
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 08:42 PM   #96
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
I don't know what your setup is, but chaining op-amps is the best way to mix all their good sides...1364>Earth sounds miles better than the opposite, I wouldn't be that impressed by either of those alone...it's only mixed together that they make up for some totally mind blogging SQ

yeah ok, within 10 days or so I'll try the LT1028ACN8 on adapters...I wonder if it'll give the same holographic vocals as the 1364, I kinda doubt it though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 08:49 PM   #97
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vocals with the LT1028 can sound both better and worse than they sound with the LT1363, depending on the record. Meaning that the LT1363 tends to make them always pleasant, while the LT1028 tells more truth.


By the way... I have placed my good old AD845KN (on adapter) inside my "cmoy" headphone amp, with 24V power supply, and I love the sound! Sounds better in this application than OPA627BP, LT1363, LT1360...
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 08:53 PM   #98
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Yes I agree, pairing a couple of different opamps can be the best way to get the most balanced sound both spectrum wise and timbre wise.

"Unfortunately" though my DACs both have only one opamp in the signal path. So I must try hard to find the most 'universal' sounding opamp, as I said before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 10:28 PM   #99
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
..so you must find something with more swappable op-amps to play with!

2*2 is great, 2 to process the DAC output and 2 to color it even further...so you can make a nice combo, there's no such thing as a "perfect" op-amp IMHO. instead of searching for something that does not exist, get a better DAC that allows for more advanced op-amp fiddling? if it's based on an AK4396, it'll be a win-win as this DAC sounds fantastic(mandatory 128X oversampling at all sampling frequencies, yeah babe!!)

well that's what I like about vocals on the 1364, they sound surreal! if I want flat and boring, I can put more Earth's, but I don't want it natural and flat. I want it exciting, grasping, emotional
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2009, 11:27 PM   #100
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Who said that the OPA-Earth sounds natural?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
-: Best audio OpAmps :- audioPT Parts 57 13th October 2011 02:47 AM
The Best Sounding DUAL opamps mudihan Chip Amps 214 1st May 2011 06:09 PM
best sounding Tx for sub 10watt class A audio amp? mondogenerator Solid State 2 2nd October 2009 06:21 AM
Help the Idiot: Simple, Great-Sounding Integrated Amp Designs SRMcGee Tubes / Valves 7 15th September 2005 07:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Page generated in 0.13522 seconds (77.45% PHP - 22.55% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio