|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
|
Hello All,
I am working on a radio that uses a TA7222AP Audio Amplifier Chip. The Data Sheet is here: http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data.../502310_DS.pdf The circuit of the Audio section of the radio is Here: http://riley-music.com/BowsStuff/Cob...AmpSection.gif My problem is, I am having trouble getting the amplifier to pass lower than 200 Hz.. and I would like to get it down to 80 Hz and up to 6kHz. The radio was spec'ed for 300Hz - 4.5kHz, but i am looking for a more natural, less pinched sound. Can you all help me figure out where my bottle neck is? I realize this isn't Hi-Fi audio, but this is the only forum I know of with this many "Chip Amp" Gurus on it. Thank you for your time.
__________________
Bow |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The first bottleneck is the feedback capacitor. The datasheet specs it to be 100µF, while your radio only has 10 µF there. That seems consistent with your description, because 1/(2*PI*82 Ohm*10µF) = 191,8 Hz.
The second bottleneck will be the 470 µF output capacitor. Depending on the speaker load that may have to be increased as well to achieve a lower roll-off. The datasheet specs a 1000 µF capacitor for a 4 Ohm load. 470 µF would therefore be okay for an 8 Ohm speaker.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
|
Thanks For the reply and the information.
Quote:
From the graph, it looks like the larger the Feedback Cap, The more pronounced the mid-range is? Your formula is interesting, Where is that from or what is the formula called? I would find that very useful for some of my projects. Quote:
I didn't mention in my first post that I tried that first, I dropped a 1000uf in the output, it didn't change the response a large amount, but it did help. Thanks you for your time, I'm going to drop a 100uf in the Feedback and see how that goes.
__________________
Bow |
||
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
|
Great, Thanks for the help
As a side note, I found out that the Amp is doing its thing.. it is the choke/transformer after it that is saturating below 200Hz... Time for a re-engineer of the system
__________________
Bow |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07715 seconds (78.62% PHP - 21.38% MySQL) with 9 queries |