|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Arizona
|
Either way is acceptable. I found my little amp to be just right for computer operation.
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
there are at least two big differences between Toroid and EI. The Toroid has lower regulation. The Toroid has less attenuation of the HF. Operationally there is a big difference between 12-0-12 and 12-0 + 12-0. The 12-0 + 12-0 can be easily converted to Centre tap and both versions suit a single single rectifier with the centre tap connected to Audio Ground. The 12-0-12 cannot be converted to dual secondary. Only the dual secondary can use the dual bridge rectifiers, with the zero volts line connected to the Audio Ground. In a monoblock this makes absolutely no difference. In a multi-channel amplifier, this can make a big difference in the flexibility of organising your separated audio grounds. If you plan to build any multi-channel amplifiers and want the flexibility to experiment with the grounding, then buy the dual or quadruple secondary transformer.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Arizona
|
Quote:
In this particular case dual secondaries are'nt necessary. It is doubtful that dual 12 volt secondaries would be used to power multiple amps.Get a Marlon Jones iron job for little money and enjoy the sound.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I just got my PCB's and it looks like in this case, it doesn't matter (as the previous poster said)
There is no provisioning on the board for 2x full bridge rectifiers. Same goes for the mini-a PS pcb, but I'll ask my questions about that one in the correct forum. (I haven't seen a single aleph PS schematic that doesn't use dual rectifiers) |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Well, I got them built last night.
I found an old audiosource SS3 surround sound processor w/ a 14-0-14, 100va tx inside. ALSO, a nice double heatsink. The SS3 was a little chip amp, w/ the other brand (not lm) chip of about the same power as the 1875. (sorry, parts aren't near me and I forget what chips it had) So, finding that ss3 in a stack of old stuff in my basement was a huge help on this, and saved me a lot of money! It sounds great on my 'big' speakers (little 6" full rangers) and I'm sure it will be perfect for its intended use as a computer/desktop speaker amp. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1875 v/s 1554 | pra3718 | Chip Amps | 31 | 20th July 2009 09:34 AM |
| Lm 1875 problem? :( | fr1s | Chip Amps | 50 | 16th February 2009 03:01 PM |
| Please grade my 1875 PCB | soundNERD | Chip Amps | 16 | 2nd February 2004 04:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07724 seconds (78.36% PHP - 21.64% MySQL) with 10 queries |