PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ? PA150 (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th April 2009, 11:19 PM   #1
nickthevoice is offline nickthevoice  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Quebec
Default PA150 (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?

Hello !

I buy PA150 (3x LM3886) but I don't know if this board is able to load 2 ohm ?

If you know what's parts change to make PA150 2 ohm capability please help me !


In the national.com sheet I don't find any spec on PA150 but the PA100 and the BPA200 have 2 ohm capability version.

thanks in advance for your help !


nicK
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2009, 08:14 AM   #2
pacificblue is offline pacificblue  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Depends on the supply voltage. According to AN-1192 PA-100 is 2 Ohm stable with up to 28 V rails.

Assume 38 V rails for PA-150. A nominal 2 Ohm speaker can dip down to 1,6 Ohm. 38 V / 1,6 Ohm = 23,75 A. 23,75 A / 3 = 7,92 A, which is just below the 8 A current limit. A bit close for comfort, but PA-150 should therefore be 2 Ohm stable at all supply voltages provided that the heatsink is big enough.

If you assume 38 V rails, the three ICs have a worst case dissipation of ~150 W, requiring a total thermal resistance below 0,033 K/W. Quite unrealistic, when the IC itself already has 1 K/W (T-type) or 2 K/W (TF-type).

Either keep the rails at or below 33 V for PA-150 or build PA-250 or PA-300, so that the 150 W are distributed across 5 or 6 ICs.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2009, 12:13 PM   #3
nickthevoice is offline nickthevoice  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Quebec
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR ANSWER !!!


nicK
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 05:33 PM   #4
DarpMalone is offline DarpMalone  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DarpMalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
I have a spare PA150 board and 2* 31.5VDC / 3.17A power supplies that I'm currently not using... I also have (2) 4ohm woofers so I'm thinking I can build a nice little 150W sub amp for a 2Ohm load.

Q1) Am I correct in thinking that this would be a good match for 2 Ohms? If I understand the AN-1192 notes correctly, in a PA150 config, each chip should see 6Ohms

Q2) Can I create a dual 31.5v supply by joining the (-) of PS1 to the (+) of PS2 [creating my (0) feed], then using the (+) of supply1 and (-) of supply2 for the PA150's +/- (does this present issues with ground? will I fry the PS's by doing this)?

I also have a 36VCT transformer that I guess could work, but I'm guessing the voltage would be a bit low.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 06:29 PM   #5
DarpMalone is offline DarpMalone  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DarpMalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
I guess I can't edit my post.

I've discovered that joining the 2 PS's is not as straight forward as I thought and it depends a lot on if, and how they are connected to earth, so I'll leave that alone.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 08:21 PM   #6
pacificblue is offline pacificblue  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarpMalone View Post
I also have a 36VCT transformer that I guess could work, but I'm guessing the voltage would be a bit low.
It would be enough for more than 100 W, provided the transformer has enough power. 100 W means less than 2 dB difference compared to 150 W.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarpMalone View Post
I guess I can't edit my post.
Only for a limited amount of time after writing it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarpMalone View Post
I've discovered that joining the 2 PS's is not as straight forward as I thought and it depends a lot on if, and how they are connected to earth, so I'll leave that alone.
That is right. Usually the negative connection is grounded and you cannot connect two of those SMPS in series without modifying at least one of them.

Anyway 3,17 Apk would not be sufficient for 150 W into 2 Ohm which takes 8,7 Aeff (> 12 Apk) without taking peak current demands into account.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford)
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010, 08:39 PM   #7
DarpMalone is offline DarpMalone  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DarpMalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacificblue View Post
It would be enough for more than 100 W, provided the transformer has enough power. 100 W means less than 2 dB difference compared to 150 W.
That's good news. It's a 180VA transformer. So I can still throw this thing together after building a supply.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacificblue View Post
Anyway 3,17 Apk would not be sufficient for 150 W into 2 Ohm which takes 8,7 Aeff (> 12 Apk) without taking peak current demands into account.
Thanks for your reply.

I guess I'm not understanding the concept correctly... If each chip see's 6Ohms, when paralleled, and I'm using 31.5v rails, wouldn't the current demand be much less? (8A from 31.5V rails would be a 500W supply!)

I thought I was beginning to figure this out

Last edited by DarpMalone; 15th September 2010 at 08:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010, 12:17 AM   #8
Redshift187 is offline Redshift187  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rounding to 30V for sake of ease:

30V / 6R = 5A (each IC)
30V * 5A = 150W (still each IC)
150W * 3 = 450W

It doesn't matter from the math perspective whether it's 3 chips seeing 6R or 1 chip seeing 2R. The important part is you spread out the current draw and the heat dissipation.

You weren't wrong with 500W. But that's peak and you don't really need a power supply that large unless you plan on pushing the amp hard.
__________________
Tyler

Last edited by Redshift187; 16th September 2010 at 12:21 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010, 02:10 AM   #9
DarpMalone is offline DarpMalone  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DarpMalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshift187 View Post
Rounding to 30V for sake of ease:

30V / 6R = 5A (each IC)
30V * 5A = 150W (still each IC)
150W * 3 = 450W

It doesn't matter from the math perspective whether it's 3 chips seeing 6R or 1 chip seeing 2R. The important part is you spread out the current draw and the heat dissipation.

You weren't wrong with 500W. But that's peak and you don't really need a power supply that large unless you plan on pushing the amp hard.
Hi, again, Redshift187

I'm certainly not trying to argue or challenge, I'm still confused and trying to understand the logic... The 150w should be spread between the 3 IC's, not each (50W x 3 totaling 150W, not 450W), so why are they drawing 3x the total required current?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2010, 02:54 AM   #10
abraxalito is offline abraxalito  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito
The 150W is a peak power, not sinewave or music power. So the requirement for this current from each IC (5A) is very shortlived.
__________________
'The total potential here must be nothing less than astronomical.'
'Nothing less. The number 10 raised almost literally to the power of infinity.'
  Reply With Quote

Reply


PA150  (3x LM3886) 2 ohm capability ?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PA150 PCBs, is there any interest CJ900RR Chip Amps 40 16th April 2009 04:25 PM
PA150 review FlexQ Chip Amps 3 6th March 2009 04:02 PM
Pa150 Nate805 Chip Amps 1 14th November 2008 12:15 PM
They have arrived, PA150! CJ900RR Chip Amps 36 2nd September 2008 02:17 PM
Pre-DAC switching capability? Commited Digital Source 5 9th January 2006 05:29 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki