Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th February 2010, 10:04 AM   #351
:)
diyAudio Member
 
panson_hk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by PauloPT View Post
Is 0.22R the best value or should I use higher value than that?
Lower is better as long as the circuit is stable. I have used 0.22R with two pairs of IRFP240/9240 without any problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2010, 10:07 AM   #352
PauloPT is online now PauloPT  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Send a message via MSN to PauloPT
OK, 0.22R it is!

Thank you again Panson!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2010, 11:17 AM   #353
Telstar is offline Telstar  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by panson_hk View Post
I implemented two-pole compensation to a LME49811 with ThermalTrak amp. The high-frequency distortion is reduced. Here is an example: 123W into 8 Ohm load. The result is very promising.
Yup, it is
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2010, 11:56 AM   #354
diyAudio Member
 
blueskynis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Niš
Send a message via MSN to blueskynis Send a message via Yahoo to blueskynis
Quote:
Originally Posted by panson_hk View Post
I implemented two-pole compensation to a LME49811 with ThermalTrak amp. The high-frequency distortion is reduced. Here is an example: 123W into 8 Ohm load. The result is very promising.

Cc1 = 22pF (single-pole cap)
Cc2 = 44 pF
Rc1 = 5.6 k
Yea, that's good result.

Now, if you have time, please try Cc2 100pF, unsolder the Rc1 resistor and solder a 1k8 resistor between capacitors and the output with a wire, just like I have shown in my previous posts. The THD results should be similar but the impulse response should be the same as with the standard miller compensation. With two-pole compensation you have overshoot.
__________________
Windows-free with Fedora 13
== www.diy-audio-engineering.org ==
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2010, 01:16 PM   #355
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by panson_hk View Post
I implemented two-pole compensation to a LME49811 with ThermalTrak amp. The high-frequency distortion is reduced. Here is an example: 123W into 8 Ohm load. The result is very promising.

Cc1 = 22pF (single-pole cap)
Cc2 = 44 pF
Rc1 = 5.6 k
Dear Panson,

Such a distortion rise in the higher frequencies are sometimes suspective. Are you really sure that somewhere high in the MHz. range there isn't any oscillation?

I end up with this scheme, after advice from the National designer on this forum, and it killed the Mhz. range oscillation.

With kind regards,
Bas
Attached Images
File Type: png Screen shot 2010-02-09 at 2.15.11 PM.png (14.0 KB, 420 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2010, 02:29 PM   #356
diyAudio Member
 
blueskynis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Niš
Send a message via MSN to blueskynis Send a message via Yahoo to blueskynis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan View Post
Dear Panson,

Such a distortion rise in the higher frequencies are sometimes suspective. Are you really sure that somewhere high in the MHz. range there isn't any oscillation?

[snip]
The THD diagram looks quite normal to me

And that is not a two pole compensation.
__________________
Windows-free with Fedora 13
== www.diy-audio-engineering.org ==

Last edited by blueskynis; 9th February 2010 at 02:34 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2010, 03:14 PM   #357
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueskynis View Post
The THD diagram looks quite normal to me

And that is not a two pole compensation.
It isn't a two pole. I wanted to point this out, because I experienced myself oscillation's far away, which wasn't visible or noticeable on first sight. This compensation scheme solved it.

Btw. My example shows one error, the cap should be connected to the sink pin instead of the source

With kind regards,
Bas
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2010, 03:53 PM   #358
klewis is offline klewis  United States
diyAudio Member
 
klewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Blog Entries: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan View Post
Dear Panson,

Such a distortion rise in the higher frequencies are sometimes suspective. Are you really sure that somewhere high in the MHz. range there isn't any oscillation?

I end up with this scheme, after advice from the National designer on this forum, and it killed the Mhz. range oscillation.

With kind regards,
Bas
I'm doing the exac same thing as Bas. It's from AudioMan54 (Mark) from the National Op Amp Inflation thread. I haven't had any problem with oscillation.

As I recall this compensation scheme was created to help the amp come out of clipping smoothly.

I have had issues with overshoot in the square wave with the zobel connected. Disconnected it goes away.

Ken
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2010, 04:02 PM   #359
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Dear,

Here square wave measurements. In this case the LME49810 with a pair of STD03's. Compensation only 10pF miller cap without the extra added filter. No sign of oscillation or overshoot, still it was oscillating at 10Mhz. With normal squarewave test or THD measurements I would't have seen it.

Resp: 1Khz. and 10Khz. Square wave.

With kind regards,
Bas
Attached Files
File Type: pdf P8sqr.pdf (101.4 KB, 153 views)

Last edited by Sebastiaan; 9th February 2010 at 04:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2010, 02:54 AM   #360
:)
diyAudio Member
 
panson_hk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan View Post
Dear Panson,

Such a distortion rise in the higher frequencies are sometimes suspective. Are you really sure that somewhere high in the MHz. range there isn't any oscillation?

I end up with this scheme, after advice from the National designer on this forum, and it killed the Mhz. range oscillation.

With kind regards,
Bas
Hi Bas,

No sign of oscillation when tested with 8Ohm and 4Ohm resistive load. The output was monitored by a 500 MHz scope. I will make more test including square wave after Chinese New Year.

Panson
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
49830 tweaking traw Chip Amps 0 3rd June 2009 04:35 AM
LME 49811 Project? jaya000 Chip Amps 17 4th May 2009 01:01 PM
National LME 49811 satanx Chip Amps 2 8th May 2008 11:29 PM
My differential input 49830 Phil Olson Solid State 4 28th March 2008 06:20 AM
3886x3 vs 49830 Phil Olson Chip Amps 10 26th March 2008 06:59 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Page generated in 0.12868 seconds (76.93% PHP - 23.07% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio