|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco bay area
|
Hi all,
I am building up some 3 way speakers. Decided to biamp them. This is REALLY diving into the deep end for me but so far so good. The good news is that I made a power supply that seems to work great. Yea! And I made 4 lm3886 modules that work great. Yea! Now I'm wondering about something. My mid/high speakers are about SPL 96 or a little higher. My Woofer is around SPL 94 or a bit lower. What are my best options for changing/matching the relative volume/sensitivity? Would it work to just lower the gain a little on the mid/high amps? MrKramer |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
Active or passive crossovers?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco bay area
|
line level passive between bass and mid/tweet. 1st order.
MrKramer |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
For the extra cash and a little more complexity (not that much), an active 24 db cross-over is a worthwhile inclusion. Plus with an adjustable output buffer, you can match levels after testing.
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco bay area
|
I appreciate the suggestion but right now "a little more complexity" is something I'd like to avoid. This is my first amp and I'd like to keep it as simple as possible.
Thanks MrKramer |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Another simple solution would be to use a voltage divider for the mid/high parts of the cross-over. Either two resistors, e. g. 2k + 8k2 or a potentiometer/trimmer. You should post a schematic of the cross-over to make sure, where to put it without changing the cross-over characteristic.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco bay area
|
I don't have an active preamp before this, only a stepped attenuator. The XO is just a simple RC filter like the one here:
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/f...ssiveHLxo.html If I was going to pad down the mid/tweet I thought of putting the 2 resistors after the filter. So Attenuator>XO>Pad>Amp Since I don't have an active pre, I thought it might be better to reduce the gain a little rather than drop down the signal. Make any sense? How would I relate gain to DB? MrKramer |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Biwiring/biamp question.. | Dxvideo | Multi-Way | 7 | 18th October 2007 08:30 PM |
| A simple question from a simple man. | inteificio | Solid State | 5 | 17th October 2005 03:00 PM |
| Simple answer required for a simple question... | rabbitz | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st August 2003 10:05 AM |
| To Biamp or not to Biamp, that is the question??????? | Apogee | Pass Labs | 70 | 12th July 2002 12:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09063 seconds (87.48% PHP - 12.52% MySQL) with 10 queries |