|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
That's why it needs to be right on the output - so it comes before any stray capacitance coupling to the output wiring. It is not intended to compensate for the output coil -- the "auxiliary amplifier" diagram in the LM4780 datasheet shows the output inductor, and the Zobel is placed before it. A separate Zobel will need to be applied to the loudspeaker to compensate for the driver inductance. A Zobel correctly designed to perform one of these functions will not perform the other effectively. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Thanks for the explanation. The way I understood it was that the amplifier would be looking at the inductance of the voice coil and the inductance of the output coil in series with each other, and the Zobel needed to be closer to the chip (before the output inductor) in order to be able to compensate for both those effects. Should have thought of the gain droop at high frequencies as well.
So if there were two Zobels without an output inductor or a crossover inductor, would the amplifier not be looking at a lower than expected output impedance at high frequencies? Or does the GBW (or indeed the inductance of the speaker wire itself) take care of that by itself ? Or, as I understand it, the second Zobel is required only if there is more series inductance - either with an output coil or one in the crossover... |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
|
I have built a pair of LM1875 amplifiers (as per the typical application) on stripboard and they seem to be working fine. I put the reccomended Zobel right on the output of the chip.
This is required as well as the on-board Zobel to ensure stability? How would you reccomend I approach this? I could put it inside the speaker cabinet, or on the amplifier output terminals if it is generic enough to be applicable to most applications (though this should only be used with the speakers I posted the plot for earlier). Any suggestions on component values? |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
the amplifier Zobel is an amplifier stability component. It belongs with the amplifier. The speaker Zobel is a reactance correction for the speaker. It belongs with the speaker. These two R+C have the same name but their purpose is completely different. You must not move them from their respective optimum locations. |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
|
Ok, that's fine as I actually have very little space inside the amplifier now I look! I will place the speaker Zobel inside the speaker cabinet, probably work out some values by modelling in SwCAD
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BPA possible with TDA2030? | mateo88 | Chip Amps | 13 | 14th September 2012 01:34 PM |
| Simple TL082 Line Mixer Stripboard? | FLD | Parts | 1 | 27th August 2008 10:55 AM |
| Tda2030/2040 Pcb | d3imlay | Chip Amps | 1 | 1st January 2008 06:34 PM |
| converting PCB layout to older stripboard style?? | offpeak808 | Parts | 0 | 24th October 2005 07:49 AM |
| tda2030 or opa544 or lm in the same box | Kirll | Chip Amps | 0 | 28th January 2005 12:46 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |