Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th May 2009, 02:54 PM   #41
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
Quote:
Originally posted by linuxguru After playing around in LTSpice for while, I came up with another nested gainclone concept similar to Walt Jung's composite op-amp/buffer.

Have you tried in LTSpice using WJ's multiloop concept putting a chipamp at the output?

I mean something following the original Jung's values:

http://waltjung.org/PDFs/WTnT_Op_Amp_Audio_4.pdf

My idea had been to replace the output chip for an LM3886, but I am not sure if they are unity-gain stable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2009, 04:21 PM   #42
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally posted by linuxguru

In the sims, the LM1875 can be used below the recommended gain of 10 with suitable compensation. However, I'm not sure that it extends all the way to a gain of 2. For unity gain or similar operation, the TI/Burr-Brown OPA549 family may be more useful, since they're unity-gain stable.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2009, 07:15 PM   #43
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
I did read that comment on the OPA549 being more suitable for that unity gain job, and in fact the 3886 datasheet advises a minimum of x10 closed loop gain.

So it looks as if the Jung concept might not be applied if using that chip.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2009, 12:35 AM   #44
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
another member says it's possible to stabilise the 3886 down to 3times. But, he did not specify the phase margin.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2009, 04:59 PM   #45
jcx is offline jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
I worry that stability considerations for "nesting" slow, high minimum stable gain, power chip amps in effective multiloop amps are non-trivial

Jung's multiloop examples all use much faster output amps such that the input op amp's dominant pole compensation is fine for the whole loop since the fast output amp doesn't contribute very much phase shift at the unity loop gain intercept

with power chip amps you can't afford any extra phase shift at their (GBWmin )/ (Min stable gain)

that means that the input op amp's contribution to the outer loop gain must be flat from way below that frequency to >4x the power chip amp's max GBW/min stable gain

on the lower side this can mean you have to roll off the input op amp's gain to 0 dB near 20KHz - meaning your nesting isn't able to improve the power amp's behavior at or beyond that frequency

some have relied on the power amp never being worse than the typical spec on GBW - not a safe practice for diy builders without oscilloscopes and some knowledge of how to test for stability

I have built several multiloop amps with fast output devices – the most “powerful chip amp” I’ve used for the output is the LT1210 – but with its typical op amp Vsupply limits it wouldn’t go far with 8 Ohm loads

I would look for faster power amps – anyone know the GBW min spec for TDA729x DMOS chip amps?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2009, 06:19 PM   #46
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Default As a fly on the wall

Anyone think about the LM12 as an output device?

Mark
__________________
Mark
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 03:08 AM   #47
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
Default Re: As a fly on the wall

Quote:
Originally posted by mwmkravchenko
Anyone think about the LM12 as an output device?
Things might get a bit expensive if you do. The LM12 is far from cheap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2009, 08:37 AM   #48
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
I had put this on the back-burner for a few months, and then took another look at it over the last week. I added a lifted ground and tweaked the compensation schema for better stability, and the THD20 is even lower and mostly even-harmonic. It now looks good enough to build a prototype.

A few notes on the schematic below:

1) Vi and Ii are injection sources using the Tien-Vishwanathan method for the open-loop gain simulation plots only. In the real circuit, Vi is a short and Ii is open.

2) R6 is required for the simulation to converge quickly - it's the equivalent of a base-stopper in discrete topologies.

3) The outer-loop gain and compensation is set by R8, R9 and C7.

4) The inner-loop gain and compensation is set by R4, R5 and C6. C6 is not very critical - any value above 22pF seems to work fine, with increasing stability (as well as THD) as C6 is increased. The 33pF value shown is a good compromise; higher values like 47 pF or 68 pF can be attempted on the first prototype for improved stability.

5) THD20 simulates at ~ -130 dB at 20W into 8 ohms, with a unity-gain phase margin of ~85 degrees.

6) No Boucherot/Zobel network is required.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lm1875_ne5532_20w.jpg (98.0 KB, 314 views)
File Type: jpg lm1875_ne5532_20w_loopgain.jpg (89.5 KB, 298 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2009, 08:42 AM   #49
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Send a message via Yahoo to linuxguru
Here is the THD20 FFT plot at 20W into 8 ohms - THD20 is ~ -130 dB, mostly even harmonic. At lower swings, the odd harmonics almost vanish.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lm1875_ne5532_20w_fft.jpg (95.3 KB, 270 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2009, 01:40 PM   #50
diyAudio Member
 
blueskynis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Niš
Send a message via MSN to blueskynis Send a message via Yahoo to blueskynis
Little suggestion,

I don't like high impedance feedback circuits. Lower a bit the impedance of feedback circuits to decrease noise (main reason), DC offset and possibly THD (because input currents are highly nonlinear). Also, R1 could be lower to decrease noise. Besides, nice work, keep going

Cheers,

Nesa
__________________
Windows-free with Fedora 13
== www.diy-audio-engineering.org ==
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gainclone troulbe (LM1875 distorsion issue) haft Chip Amps 10 25th February 2007 09:29 PM
My LM1875 gainclone... point2point... w00t Chip Amps 21 23rd March 2005 10:12 AM
lm1875 gainclone lack speed tonitze Chip Amps 16 8th March 2005 10:36 AM
2 general gainclone questions, and an lm1875 question Adam M. Chip Amps 11 4th March 2005 12:53 PM
Just fired up my new dual mono lm1875 Gainclone. Shoog Chip Amps 5 19th January 2004 07:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.10604 seconds (86.54% PHP - 13.46% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio