|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U.K
|
The LM3875 has output protection from a short to ground, and the SPiKe protection is said to protect a short to the supplies.
I managed to blow one up when checking the rail voltages by attaching the DMM to V- before securing the other probe to grd. Should this have happened? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Two possibilities that occur to me:
There was no cap at CI, or Electrostatic discharge. Its good that the chip simply quit--because the usual malfunction is full rail voltage into the speaker. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U.K
|
Ci is an optional feeback cap to ensure unity gain at DC?
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
To your question: Yes. The amplifier is more durable and dynamic with that cap in place. Although its difficult to select a capacitor for seemly results at CI, it IS possible and you do get the benefit of larger dynamics, a variety of input impedances available (see page 6), as well as more powerful low bass (See overture design spreadsheet) along with less clipping; and, you get a more durable amplifier. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well man, really, I think the reason it broke is that a power cap suddenly discharged, probably with the help of the voltmeter probe and some static electricity as a bonus (ESD).
What I was trying to say, is that without CI in place, the LM3875 would have tried to amplify the zap by about the gain factor, and blew itself out. That's my guess on it.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U.K
|
anyone else got a take on this? The PS rail cap (1,000uf) survived.
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Here is another quote from the same document Quote:
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
We were just discussing fuses on another thread, so howabout some fast-blo at the speaker output + side? The no-load operating tolerances are so much higher.
OMG! This could help me too! I managed to somehow purchase a boxfull of counterfeit LM1875 and while usable as TDA2050's, they are prone to mysterious failures. Now counting in a fuse holder, the wonderful sale price was not so economical after all. Oh well. Its probably more-seemly to blow a fuse instead. It might give me some clues as to the cause of failure, because of such immediate notice that a fuse can give. Thanks for the ideas!! |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
a fuse is too slow to protect the semiconductors.
Where a fuse can be good is for long term overload when a current limiting circuit prevents immediate damage to the semiconductor, but continued power dissipation increases the device temperature. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: U.K
|
This was a split second flash as the probe connected!
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JFET's ready for abuse | Magura | Pass Labs | 39 | 24th March 2009 11:01 PM |
| looking for methods to abuse amps | sakis | Solid State | 34 | 31st July 2008 05:39 PM |
| Reporting an abuse caused Thread Close? | jkeny | Everything Else | 6 | 20th April 2008 06:50 AM |
| My wacky budget n00bie 3-way thread. Abuse wanted! | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 1 | 5th January 2007 12:17 AM |
| sample policy abuse | mirlo | Parts | 1 | 19th December 2006 05:41 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |