|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Podgorica, Serbia and Montenegro
|
I want to build a regulated supply for LM3886 based amp.
Each of two channels should have its own regulators. From the grounding point of view what is the better approach: - one transformer with 4 secondaries or - two transformers (one per channel) with dual secondaries? Thanks and regards, Baki |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
4 secondaries is 4 secondaries. It does not matter how you get there.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Podgorica, Serbia and Montenegro
|
Thanks, Andrew.
I'm still in doubt about what to build: two monoblocks or dual mono configuration and what is more easy and sound wise better to implement, if possible. I am aware of what you have said at this thread - Please help a newbie... Is it worth an effort to spend an extra money for two transformers, to build two monoblocks, instead of one with for secondaries, for dual mono? In the case of two monoblocks the approach to grounding should be in the way of total physical separation between them including separate disconnecting network...right? The ground of one monoblock is connected via one signal channel with the ground of the source. Am I right? Please help. Thanks, Baki |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
You said:
From the grounding point of view what is the better approach: - one transformer with 4 secondaries or - two transformers (one per channel) with dual secondaries? Go for the: - two transformers (one per channel) with dual secondaries :-) Be safe and have fun !!! |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
from a grounding point of view, it makes no difference as long as the 4winding are isolated from the mains and from each other.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Podgorica, Serbia and Montenegro
|
Thanks Andrew and Jacobsen.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UTC A-43 transformer - advantage in parelleling dual secondaries? | sharpi31 | Parts | 0 | 14th July 2009 04:18 PM |
| FS: (2) 1.7KVA transformers, dual 45v secondaries | cowanrg | Swap Meet | 8 | 13th May 2008 07:33 PM |
| Need help with dual secondaries in series | glt | Chip Amps | 5 | 12th November 2007 06:41 AM |
| Wanted: Transformer 22-25 VAC Dual Secondaries - Toroid or other | DSchmidt | Swap Meet | 4 | 3rd January 2006 09:04 PM |
| Transformer Dual Primaries/Secondaries | cantskienuf | Parts | 6 | 18th July 2005 08:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07879 seconds (76.64% PHP - 23.36% MySQL) with 10 queries |