|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
HI Andrew,
What would the line AC have to be for a 40-0-40 to break 75VDC? I have measured mine several times (admittedly, our electrical system seems to be very stable here) and I've never gotten over 57VDC after rectification and smoothing. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
rather than a simple "yes/no", I gave him "how to".
Hopefully he now knows "how to" in future. Your simple "yes/no" means he and others keep coming back with the same question because it doesn't help them learn. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
The how to was fine.
It was the bickering and finger-pointing about who's responsible for your flaky power grid over there that I had enough of...
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The reason for harmonisation rather lies in international industrial interests than in European force. You still pay in £ instead of €, and still drive on the wrong side of the street, both of which does not give me the impression that Europeans can force a lot upon you. And the reason, why the tolerances are so high can rather be found in the US of A, with their very different infrastructure than in Europe.
__________________
If you've always done it like that, then it's probably wrong. (Henry Ford) |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
Ha, you guys.
Thanks for the how to, it seems there is always something more to learn. I'll be ordering parts tomorrow, and hopefully have some modules up working within a couple of weeks. So far my line voltage has been 123V +/-.5V
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
Lets do a little off the cuff power dissipation estimation...
from the an-1850 pdf: PD(AMP)MAX = VCC^2/(2pi^2RL) where Vcc is the sum of the + and - rails (guessing 108V for my case) and RL is the resistance of the load, lets assume 8ohms. The modules have four devices total, and the above equation gives 74W total power dissipation, each device sees about 18.5W. My woofer will be about 4 ohms, which gives total power dissipation of 148W and 37W per device. Not bad if you derate the devices to 90W max for SOA. There are a few things I don't understand. Is this calculation for a signal swinging to the rails? Isn't power dissipation higher with the signal at about half the rail voltage? Lets calculate total quiescent power dissipation. The woofer will be biased at about 100mA - would this give 10.8W loss with no signal? The tweeter I plan on biasing up to 1A, so I guess the power dissipation will be 108W total. How's that sound? So for the tweeter module working into 8 ohms, does the 108W of quiescent power loss add to the 74W of max power loss, meaning each device will possibly be seeing 45.5W power loss at maximum? The other thing I don't understand is how changing the number of devices changes the power dissipation - it seems like fewer devices would lead to less power available and therefore less power dissipation, but the above equation doesn't factor it in. Seems like the power dissipation per device would actually be higher. I was hoping that using fewer devices on the tweeter module would help compensate for biasing it higher, but it looks like it will just make them blow faster..
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
sorry, I was being glib. I understand your point.
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
Hi, I looked at the amp you want to use. You will use National's board layout? It's huge and I can't see three of those fitting on a 5.5" x 12" heatsink. I think you can find a better, more economical amp design to work with. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
Hmmm, you might have a point. The National pcb is about 5.75" wide, and the heatsink is about 5.38". I had missed that. I could redo the pcb without too much trouble, but I'd really rather not.
EDIT: the same seller has 8.5" wide extrusions, which should work just as well.
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LME49830 power amplifier ,have anyone build | jazzman06 | Chip Amps | 3 | 8th January 2010 12:15 PM |
| Lme49830 | nickarsow | Chip Amps | 94 | 18th March 2009 08:57 AM |
| LME49830 with (HEX)Fets | Kay | Chip Amps | 16 | 24th February 2009 03:13 AM |
| Lme49830 | enzedone | Solid State | 6 | 21st February 2008 03:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |