|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
hey, on the amplifier i built to replace the amplifier in my powered advents i have between 40-60mv offset on the tweeter amplifier. im worried this is a hair high to be directly coupled to the tweeters.
tho im sure the tweeters will handle 20-30W, 60mv still worries me. is it safe to have 60mv across a tweeter, or should i use a coupling cap, or try to squeeze a cap in the feedback loop the tweeters are the late 70s orange advent ones. amplifier is a typical non-inverting LM3886 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You didn't mention the impedance.
A 4 Ohm speaker will have a DC resistance between 3 and 4 Ohms, so let us assume 3 Ohms as worst case scenario. 60mV/3Ohm=20mA 60mV x 20mA = 1,2mW Half that number for an 8 Ohm speaker. A while ago I stumbled accross a homepage, where a speaker manufacturer had tested the DC power rating of a woofer. It worked up to 1/30 of the nominal AC rating. That would be 0,67 to 1 W for your tweeter. Looks like enough of a safety margin. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
i beleive the dc resistance of the tweeter is somewhere between 6 and 8 ohms. the orignal amplifiers said to test them into a 6 ohm load.. yet all advents "non powered" are 8 ohm loads.
i kinda wish i used a servo on this like i did the bridged-parrelled ones, those have 1mv or less offset
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
The power dissipated in the voicecoil may be tiny at 60mV, but the voicecoil will be displaced from its normal resting position. This may affect the linearity of reproduction.
Another possible problem with driving tweeters directly (ie. no passive crossover) is that if the power amp fails and the output latches to one of the power supply rails, the tweeter will go up in smoke. A wise precaution is to add a series film cap that has a largish value. This also has the benefit of implementing a 1st order high pass filter, so that no low frequency components make it to the tweeter. Something above 10uF is in the ball park.
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
A wise precaution is to add a series film cap
that has a largish value. This is the usual capacitor out coupling. Has been used for ages in all times in power amplifier in the junction: amp output -> tweeter, woofer > For headphones protection we can 100 - 1000 uF, depending on Impedance. > For single Power supply Amplifiers into 4/8 Ohm speakers, we can use 2200 - 10000 uF, depending on wanted low freq roll off. > In speaker crossover X-Over filters, they use all sorts of values, depending on the actual speaker x-over used and the woofers/tweeters impedances. To find a really DC Coupled amplifier to speaker woofer connection we have to look for some Active Loudspeaker Systems. Where the x-over is done, actively or passively, BEFORE the power amp INPUT. Lineup
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Devon UK
|
Quote:
You really need to find the problem that is causing this and fix it. Frank |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
im using active crossovers before both poweramps. thats the whole point of the system.
as far as why the offset is so high, many posts on here suggest it is normal for LM3886's. so i stopped wondering why it was so high the tweeter amplifier is a single lm3886 with a 2.2uf cap on the input with a 1M resistor to ground , then a 20k pot , a 1k resistor in series to the non inverting input. i have a 20k feedback resistor with a 1k to ground. and a 1000uf 50v cap along with a .1uf cap on each rail right by the chip if i turn the pot all the way down, essentially shorting the input of the opamp right after the 1k resistor, my offset drops to 16mv. id love to get the offset lower, but im out of ideas? my feedback resistor matches my resistor to ground on the input "20k" |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
change the topology to AC coupled. i.e. both the input DC blocking cap and the NFB DC blocking cap must be fitted. Then match the resistances seen by the two input pins. Finally trim the input resistances to remove the last bit of offset. If you require the offset to stay substantially zero then add a DC servo to correct offset drift as the chip temperature changes. All the partially DC coupled topologies will generate output offset.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
thanks for responding so fast andrew,
so is 40-60mv offset on a dc circuit normal? or still on the highside? i had considered changing my feedback resistor to 50k, and the resistor to ground to keep my 21 gain, but keep the 20k pot on the input, and see how much my offset drops.. and go from there but if 40-60mv IS normal, its fine by me. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Horizontal deflection (or high voltage type) transistors to directly drive ESLs? | bigwill | Planars & Exotics | 121 | 21st May 2006 08:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11253 seconds (73.12% PHP - 26.88% MySQL) with 11 queries |