|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
The new driver ic LME49811 from National looks very nice.
But i can't see here that any body hv used it. How about making some amplifier design of 300W~500W @ 4 ohms from this? Suggestions & guidance is welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
I have these chips and some transistors, and I'm in the planning stages of cobbling together an amp of similar output power.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: barcelona
|
I was using lme49811 as a driver for a 70 W class A MosFET power amplifier, and it work very well.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
It seems that most DIY applications use MOSFET output stages. I have some bipolars already, so I'm committed to using those.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: barcelona
|
If you plan to use BJT , probably you will need a current driver stage to increase the limited current of lme 49811 (9ma) to higher levels.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here's an LME49811 Project which I sent out to the proto-house yesterday afternoon -- I was really thrilled at the results of an amp build with the LM4702 and the Sanken STD03N and STD03P -- self compensating Darlingtons -- but the LM4702 topology isn't quite as "adaptable" as the single LME49811. The Sanken's were very stable:
I used the noise-gain comp circuit -- we will see how this works compared to the originally recommended cap between the COMP and SINK pins: ![]() and a 3D image:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Excellent picture & drawing jackinnj!
Congratulations! Waiting for ur test results. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
@ jackinnj:
What software did you use to do that 3-D rendering?
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparing LME49810, 49830 and 49811 | panson_hk | Chip Amps | 475 | 11th May 2011 07:44 PM |
| CDPRO2 Group Project (open source project) | BrianGT | Digital Source | 147 | 8th August 2008 12:37 PM |
| National LME 49811 | satanx | Chip Amps | 2 | 8th May 2008 11:29 PM |
| My OLD Project....... cheap tube audio project!!! | tube-lover | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th May 2008 10:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09896 seconds (80.89% PHP - 19.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |