|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I use Ultiboard -- the only reason I have a webstore is to pay the danged license and fees.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Jack,
May you compare SAP15 and STD03 series from Sanken except the emitter resistor? Do you think their sound quality comparable? And another question; You mentioned "but the LM4702 topology isn't quite as "adaptable" as the single LME49811". What do you mean? As I read theyre very close components.. 49811 may described as single channel 4702 as I understand.. But what differences do you see between them?
__________________
Best regards, Ozgur |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The LM4702 is dual -- the LME49811 seems to be an identical single version. I find it easier to deal with the single version for boards that I sell on the webstore as folks find them easier to deal with in the various permutation of heats sinks they have available. The dual kind of pins you in to a specific heat sink configuration -- especially if you're driving MOSFETs in which the lead length is critical.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
|
Quote:
Dear jackinnj, Why not go with the LME49810? which have a higher slew rate? A very accurate and handy clip indication and baker clamp with good clip behavior without saturate your transistors. I've got wonderful results with this chip together with the STD03's ![]() With best regards, Bas |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It's a trade-off of simplicity and THD% vs stability and SR.
You'll have to ask the fellows from National Semi, but it was my impression that the LME49810 was designed a bit more for PA applications, the LME49811 a bit more for high end AV. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit, born and raised in the netherlands.
|
Jack,
I looked at your web-store. Are you thinking about offering a complete kit for the LME49811? It seems like you are geared more toward the advance user? Thanks! |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
A friend of mine has just got a gainclone based on the LM4702, but I need more power, a dual-mono version using the lme49811 would be the perfect choice, right?
Quote:
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparing LME49810, 49830 and 49811 | panson_hk | Chip Amps | 475 | 11th May 2011 06:44 PM |
| CDPRO2 Group Project (open source project) | BrianGT | Digital Source | 147 | 8th August 2008 11:37 AM |
| National LME 49811 | satanx | Chip Amps | 2 | 8th May 2008 10:29 PM |
| My OLD Project....... cheap tube audio project!!! | tube-lover | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th May 2008 09:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09413 seconds (76.31% PHP - 23.69% MySQL) with 10 queries |