|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
My electronic knowledge is limited so this might be a basic question ...
The attached section of circuit diagram is one channel of the output stage of a NAD 5420 CDP. Q202 and Q204 are both NE5532 dual opamps but as you can see Q202 is using only pins 5,6 & 7 while Q204 is using pins 1,2,3, 4 & 8. It appears to me that only half of each of these dual opamps is being used. Is this correct? Secondly, Q202 appears not to be using the V+ & V- power supply connections. Are they omitted by convention or if not, what's the role of this opamp? I ask these questions because I had been planning to replace the NE5532 opamps in my CDP with a set of Burson's discrete component dual opamps but it doesn't look logical to just replace both [or all 4] of the NE5532s with 4 x dual Burson opamps. parrot |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
I'd hazard a guess and say the other half of Q202 is used in the other channel of the stereo pair, and pins 4 & 8 will be shown on that.
Likewise, the other half of Q204 is in used in the other channel, and doesn't have pins 4 & 8 shown.
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
Yes, there's logic behind that suggestion but the other side uses a completely separate pair and that's clear from the full circuit diagram [as well as by looking inside the box :-)].
parrot |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
Hope this is clear enough ...
If I try to fit any more in it could get blurred perhaps? If it is as it appears to be, what's happening with opamps Q201 & Q202, which don't seem to have a power supply? parrot |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
Very intriguing. Have a look at the underside of the PCB ! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
and a little more .......
parrot |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How many actual 5532 are in that area of the board ?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
four ... :-)
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Look at the underside, see if one half really is unused !
Sounds a bit bizzare to me. Cost is everything to a manufacturer, they won't waste half an I/C. Is there a headphone amp ? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Opamps | Charlez | Swap Meet | 2 | 17th August 2008 11:45 AM |
| FS/WTT: Opamps | seiko_citizen | Swap Meet | 0 | 20th October 2006 10:23 AM |
| OPamps | xaudiox | Swap Meet | 2 | 31st August 2006 03:40 AM |
| FS: Power Chip OpAmps and other OpAmps & D to A Converter | dtm1962 | Swap Meet | 4 | 12th January 2006 11:07 PM |
| Nad 5420 display problem | harry303 | Parts | 3 | 3rd April 2005 07:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10334 seconds (86.50% PHP - 13.50% MySQL) with 11 queries |