Toroid output voltage for 4780 parallel? - diyAudio
 Toroid output voltage for 4780 parallel?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 21st February 2008, 10:33 AM #1 zdr   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Brussels, Beograd Toroid output voltage for 4780 parallel? I am starting new clone with one 4780 per channel in parallel. I kinda have problems to find 22V RMS voltage output toroids here in Benelux. Conrad has only 18 and 30V for 400VA and 500VA toroids. for 100W RMS per channel, calculation shows 22V at 4 ohm. Should I go for 18V, 30V or something (somewhere) else?
 21st February 2008, 10:52 AM #2 AndrewT   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Scottish Borders What is your target output power and intended load impedance for your paralleled stereo amplifier (4chipamps)? __________________ regards Andrew T. Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard
 21st February 2008, 11:04 AM #3 zdr   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Brussels, Beograd 4780 in parallel is capable of 100W RMS per channel, and load should be standard, 4-8 ohm.
 21st February 2008, 11:38 AM #4 zdr   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Brussels, Beograd After rethinking it a bit, I guess 18V is out of the question. It seems that both versions have very similar output current values, so voltage ceiling might be hit easily with 18V one. On the 30V side, 6.6 Amps RMS current capacity of 500VA 30V trafo should run down to 2.3 ohms (approx) just fine at 100W peak (not sure what are the losses exactly inside those transformers, but that should affect mostly RMS voltage drop, and 30V is lot more to drop from than 18V). Need to check 4780 output specs too.
 21st February 2008, 12:38 PM #5 AndrewT   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Scottish Borders Hi, if you want 100W into 4r0 from a parallel pair, then each chip thinks it is driving 50W into 8r0. That is equivalent to 28.3Vpk and 3.5Apk into the resistive load. Allowing about 4.1V loss through the amplifier indicates that 28.3+4.1=+-33.5Vdc is required from the PSU when delivering full power. Now make a decision. Do you design for continuous (say for 1 or 2 seconds) maximum power into this load or will you accept a short term power peak into that load. For continuous power you must allow for sag in the PSU voltage as the smoothing capacitors discharge to the fully loaded condition. This tends to give more controlled and deeper bass. Alternatively, the peak power rating can be met from the fully charged capacitors but as the duration of the signal is increased the PSU drops to pass less continuous power to the load. This reportedly tends to favour midrange and treble frequencies. The sag could vary between 2V for a very high capacity PSU to 6V for a cheap low capacity PSU. I would suggest you design for +-[33.5+2V] for your first guess at quiescent load. After allowing for rectifier loss and Vdrop supplying quiescent current and for 5% transformer regulation this 35.5Vdc can be supplied by a 23+23Vac, 300VA toroid for powering 100+100W. Use at least +-20mF for the two chipamps if you want deep bass, or twin PSU each with >=+-10mF/chipamp. Personally I would fit +-15 to 20mF for every chipamp. __________________ regards Andrew T. Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard
 21st February 2008, 12:45 PM #6 BWRX   diyAudio Moderator Emeritus     Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Pennsylvania You could get the transformer with 30VAC secondaries and unwind some turns to lower the voltage a bit. __________________ Brian
 21st February 2008, 04:58 PM #7 danielwritesbac   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2007 Or you could parallel some LM1875's with the 18v. Sure that's a bit warm, but it'll rock the house quite nicely. They're about 2db behind the big chip, but with firmer driver command, they'll knock the grills off the speakers a bit more quickly. Sort of a "personal taste" difference between dynamic power or average power.
zdr
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
 Originally posted by BWRX You could get the transformer with 30VAC secondaries and unwind some turns to lower the voltage a bit.
Why would I want to wind down the output voltage, unless I would want to use a bit cheaper, 40V caps? If 22V is good, 30V is probably only better. Current capacity will stay the same anyway, so I don't see any other technical reason for this.

 21st February 2008, 08:47 PM #9 danielwritesbac   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2007 30+30vAC (60vct rated transformer) = 42+42vdc and that's too hot. This will set off the spike protection. 22+22vAC (44vct rated transformer) = 32+32vdc and that's pretty good (somewhere near optimal). 18+18vAC (36vct rated transformer) = 27+27vdc and that's going to "less hot," but make less amplifier power. In decibels, the end result is probably little to none noticable difference between any of the three options. Remember, it takes 2x the amplifier power to make each +3db to the speakers, and it takes 10x the amplifier power for every 2x difference to the ear. Bring in speakers and ears, then the 18v secondaries look good. Hey don't worry, it'll still get the heatsinks plenty hot, especially if its one of the "TF" chips.
 21st February 2008, 10:11 PM #10 zdr   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Brussels, Beograd Yep, you are right. Not only that, I just noticed that |V-|+|V+|<= 84V, which is right on the edge with 2x42Vdc.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post EWorkshop1708 Power Supplies 25 28th June 2011 08:26 AM carlmart Solid State 7 1st September 2007 10:56 AM gmphadte Chip Amps 12 12th March 2007 11:42 AM jaste Chip Amps 7 17th January 2007 02:07 PM Crash&Burn Chip Amps 12 24th February 2005 09:14 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM.