Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st January 2008, 09:42 AM   #1
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Question Do Chip Amps (LM3876T) Require a Lot of Burn-In Time?

Just built my first kit chip amp using the LM3876T (with the mute function bypassed), its a very nice sounding amplifier!

See pic & comments at: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr...146370182&view

My question is how many hours of burn-in is required before the chip really frees up and sounds at its best? I ask this because I have a friend's identical LM 3876T chip amp here which seems to sound better, its more holistic and open sounding ( his is probably 5-6 years old and well run-in).

Thanks in advance...

Steve M.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 10:15 AM   #2
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Default Re: Do Chip Amps (LM3876T) Require a Lot of Burn-In Time?

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
how many hours of burn-in is required before the chip really frees up and sounds at its best?
none.
Some of the caps may require time to reform the dielectric and maybe some better types could be swapped in. Film generally sound better but are more expensive.
There may be some PSU noise getting past the PSRR of the chipamp.
It may be verging on being unstable (insufficient phase margin).
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:03 AM   #3
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
* "There may be some PSU noise getting past the PSRR of the chipamp. It may be verging on being unstable (insufficient phase margin)." *

Thanks Andrew, please explain further what you mean and perhaps what to look out for and how to resolve these issues ...and what do you mean by insufficient phase margin??

If I had to describe more fully what the difference is between my new amp and my friend's older one is that, his seems to give better separation of the performers on the stage; has better front-to-back imaging and possibly sounds softer and more natural ), it generally sounds more open hence the holistic comment above.

Other than a different chassis layout we are also using different potentiometers on the input, his is a cheap RS Components 100K log single gang Bourns pot ($9.28) while mine is a more expensive stereo 100K log Alps Blue (@$50).


Regards,

Steve M.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:03 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cape Town
Are you sure you used a suitable value for Rm (see the datasheet)? The 3876 exhibits really strange non-linear distortion when partially muted. For +-25V supplies Rm must be 22k or less.
Quote:
If I had to describe more fully what the difference is between my new amp and my friend's older one is that, his seems to give better separation of the performers on the stage; has better front-to-back imaging and possibly sounds softer and more natural ), it generally sounds more open hence the holistic comment above.
How did you do volume matching during your listening test? Even 1dB of mismatch can lead to one amp sounding "better" than the other.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:16 AM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
read up on amplifier and opamp stability.
Start with Walt Jung's web site and try following some of his "audio" articles. Then download the app notes of Ti, National etc and try Walt's opamp handbook, it gets a bit deep but everything (well almost) is in there.

You will some equipment to fully check out your chipamp.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:21 AM   #6
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Thanks Cab, we are both not using the mute function. The kit amps we've both got suggests a simple wire jumper to bypass the mute circuit.

There is a slight anomaly between his board and mine near the mute circuit. There is a 22uF electrolytic cap in this position which on his board appears to be connected a*se-about(wrong way around)! The negative of the cap on his board is in the positive position on my board (my board is clearly marked + where positive should be). The reversed position of this cap is the ONLY difference between his board and mine.

With level matching and A-B testing, just using my long experience and 'golden ears' to make such judgments ...

Regards,

Steve.:
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:36 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Great Yarmouth, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
Thanks Cab, we are both not using the mute function. The kit amps we've both got suggests a simple wire jumper to bypass the mute circuit.

There is a slight anomaly between his board and mine near the mute circuit. There is a 22uF electrolytic cap in this position which on his board appears to be connected a*se-about(wrong way around)! The negative of the cap on his board is in the positive position on my board (my board is clearly marked + where positive should be). The reversed position of this cap is the ONLY difference between his board and mine.

With level matching and A-B testing, just using my long experience and 'golden ears' to make such judgments ...

Regards,

Steve.:

Do you two also have identical speakers in an identical size / shape room? If not, take your amp to his set up. I'm sure it will sound the same then.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 11:44 AM   #8
Steve M is offline Steve M  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Mark: I've got his amp here in my room and have been directly A-Bing the two ...all components and cables kept the same.

The only things I can think of causing the difference in sound are:
- burn in time for the LM3876 chip (or maybe for the whole amp?)
- slightly different chassis layout
- the reversed (+ve) position of the 22uF cap near the mute
- the cheap Bourns pot might be outperforming the Alps Blue

Who knows... ????

Regards,

Steve.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 12:03 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Great Yarmouth, UK
I see.

It was previously mentioned that if the chip isn't properly out of mute then it will exhibit some strange distortion. I am not sure if having the mute cap the wrong way would prevent it from going in to mute properly.

Try putting the mute cap the right way around on his. You should probably do regardless, if you're sure it's the wrong way around!
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008, 12:12 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cape Town
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
Mark: I've got his amp here in my room and have been directly A-Bing the two ...all components and cables kept the same.

The only things I can think of causing the difference in sound are:
- burn in time for the LM3876 chip (or maybe for the whole amp?)
- slightly different chassis layout
- the reversed (+ve) position of the 22uF cap near the mute
- the cheap Bourns pot might be outperforming the Alps Blue
- The levels are not properly matched. Research has shown that even small differences in level can make two identical amps sound very different. The levels will need not be obviously different.

Try level matching within 1dB with a good meter, and switching to a double blind testing protocol.

Quote:
Originally posted by markiemrboo
I see.
It was previously mentioned that if the chip isn't properly out of mute then it will exhibit some strange distortion. I am not sure if having the mute cap the wrong way would prevent it from going in to mute properly.
It could be. That mute cap should be in parallel with a resistor of between 22k and 10k. The function of the cap is to reduce pop on turnon and turnoff, so a dead electrolytic shouldn't effect the normal sound of the amp, unless it were shorting.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
el84 burn in time ? mahleriana Tubes / Valves 1 27th December 2008 05:20 PM
Burn-in Time for FE167E ttan98 Multi-Way 1 1st July 2006 01:25 PM
Burn-in time capacitors tubee Solid State 0 18th April 2005 08:15 AM
Burn-in time for testing op amps ? KlausB Solid State 0 2nd January 2004 06:08 PM
Woofer break burn in time? promitheus Multi-Way 4 18th November 2003 12:42 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Page generated in 0.11362 seconds (83.74% PHP - 16.26% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio