|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Nordic, I hadn't seen your thread before so thanks for the heads up!
If that is a better layout, I may have to build another one for myself, although the one I am listening to right now is excellent! It's one of those circuits that is so good, I will one day get round to making up a PCB for it!Anyway, between us, we should have provided all the information needed to complete a Pedja buffer. I really think it is one of the things that is a 'must try' with a Gainclone (but I do qualify that by saying get the PSU right too)!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DK
|
OT:
Nuuk, you got a misprint. http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/nuukspot/...gulator15V.jpg C3 is the wrong way around. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Thanks AVR300, it is now corrected!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DK
|
My pleasure.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
If you want the best sound quality, don't use preamp. If your source is not up to a task of driving the amp directly, install a buffer at the output of the source. Somebody told me that simple Borberly buffer, (figure 15C) from the link: http://www.borbelyaudio.com/adobe/ae699bor.pdf works very well, better than more complicated designs, and that's what I would recommend for a start. You will need volume control, and it's best to install it directly at the amp's input. I was running a similar setup for a while, but later switched to S&B TVC, and to me, this is the best sound so far from a GC, especially if the amp is driven in a balanced mode and TVC is inside the amp. The amp in the following link is way better than my original Inverting Amp circuit, I was beginning with. The most advanced GainClone amp yet So, getting back to to the issue of ACTIVE or PASSIVE, I would say, if everything is done right, with passive you have more chances to achieve purity of the sound, which not neccessarily means your best sound.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Quebec
|
Thanks Peter !
![]() for YOUR INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Quebec
|
when I take a look at the price of transformer volume control.
it's very very EXPENSIVE !!! wow ! 350-400$ and more & more. TVC with 6dB gain in passif gooD but no money for that parts for the moment. P.s. it don't have JAPAN great copy for 50-100$ hihihi !! NicK
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
I also agree with Peter to some extent, on my DX HRII discrete amp, the buffer is second to just a pasive volume control....
With my myref_c I find with passive, I have better (more neutral) bass and midrange, but the higher frequency sounds just don't seem to be smooth. With a buffer it seems to smooth out the trebles a little but it is at the price of a less convinceing overall impression of realism. So I am infact running a passive control at the moment... but, as you may know the myref is no gainclone... (SS amp being modified a the moment). With plain gainclone configs I find the music tends to be lifeless and without impact without a buffer. The cost of experimenting with some of the basic buffers like the rogic buffer and the one suggested by Peter is low enough to take it as a learning experience, and it may just fit your needs perfectly. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Quebec
|
for the moment I stay in PASSIF with volume control only.
but when I have free time, I will do AudioNote M7 "japan version". It's tube preamp and it's simple ! Thanks ! NicK |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: manchester
|
hi all,
I have yet to even realy start with this as a hobby. Why does any body not ofer a kit for source switching, volume control, pree amp and buffer. if it is as simple as you are saying the kit could have more than one implementation varios stages alowing true amiters like me to build and find out what thay like or for that matter dont like. the fact that there are kist avaloble for chip amps are what are inticing me in to this as a project and for me I would find a kit that offred this tipe of thing very useful. blake |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| active vs passive xo | howard99 | Multi-Way | 4 | 25th July 2007 12:55 PM |
| Active or Passive | bjackson | Multi-Way | 30 | 4th April 2005 10:49 PM |
| Active of passive | audiobomber | Multi-Way | 9 | 31st July 2004 02:31 AM |
| dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2004 09:16 PM |
| Passive EQ to active EQ | Nuuk | Multi-Way | 13 | 24th May 2004 07:59 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |