I am about to embark on a Large LM3876 adventure with 8 Lm's for each channel......
It accured to me that you can make traditional opamps work in class A by connecting the output of the opamp to the supply via a resister.....so why should that not work with power opamps (like the LM38XX series) as well?
Has anybody tried this, or is there a reson why this can not be done?
It accured to me that you can make traditional opamps work in class A by connecting the output of the opamp to the supply via a resister.....so why should that not work with power opamps (like the LM38XX series) as well?
Has anybody tried this, or is there a reson why this can not be done?
Jonnravn said:Has anybody tried this, or is there a reson why this can not be done?
This has been discussed more than once. Did you really search?
I actually got the search engine on the page to work (I just read what it said insted of just trying to do it my way....ups!
This only produced one thread I could use (there might be something about class A lm's on page 43 or 218 or 9 of some threads which does not indicate so in there headline, but my life is just to short to sit and read all of the threads involving chipamps).
I will try the google search to see if it will do better (thanx for the tip).
This only produced one thread I could use (there might be something about class A lm's on page 43 or 218 or 9 of some threads which does not indicate so in there headline, but my life is just to short to sit and read all of the threads involving chipamps).
I will try the google search to see if it will do better (thanx for the tip).
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/KISS 190.htm
try there
uh , almost forgot to ask:
"did ya search?"
try there
uh , almost forgot to ask:
"did ya search?"
"It accured to me that you can make traditional opamps work in class A by connecting the output of the opamp to the supply via a resister....."
That will work, but it generally works better (even with small signal opamps) to use an active current source instead of the resistors.
I would use an Aleph type CCS (see Pass board).
In theory you could hit 25% efficiency, so you will need a heatsink that will dissipate 200W to put out 50W/8R, and the Aleph CCS will allow for impedance dips below 8R.
*********************************************
On second thought I would just build a Pass A40 or an Aleph. AudioXpress still sells the board for the A40 for about $6. The theoretical efficiency for the A40 is 50%.
That will work, but it generally works better (even with small signal opamps) to use an active current source instead of the resistors.
I would use an Aleph type CCS (see Pass board).
In theory you could hit 25% efficiency, so you will need a heatsink that will dissipate 200W to put out 50W/8R, and the Aleph CCS will allow for impedance dips below 8R.
*********************************************
On second thought I would just build a Pass A40 or an Aleph. AudioXpress still sells the board for the A40 for about $6. The theoretical efficiency for the A40 is 50%.
djk said:In theory you could hit 25% efficiency, so you will need a heatsink that will dissipate 200W to put out 50W/8R, and the Aleph CCS will allow for impedance dips below 8R.
How is this applicable to the LM3876? You'll need about ten in parallel to get 50W/8R class A.
Jonnravn said:I am about to embark on a Large LM3876 adventure with 8 Lm's for each channel......
It accured to me that you can make traditional opamps work in class A by connecting the output of the opamp to the supply via a resister.....so why should that not work with power opamps (like the LM38XX series) as well?
Has anybody tried this, or is there a reson why this can not be done?
Yes, some did try it and it's called class-A biasing. You don't quite get into class A, because the chip will not allow you. Audio quality seemed to worsen, not improve.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Chip Amps
- can you make LM3876 work in Class A ?