Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Car Audio

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th September 2006, 06:27 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Default 3 way front using Electronic Crossover

Just thinking...

I know 2 way is simpler than 3 way setup, and the reason why 3 way is difficult is because of the crossover and how it interacts in car.

Anyone tried 3 way using electronic crossover?

i.e., Source -> Crossover -> 6ch amp-> Speakers

Worth it? or will it be at best as good as a good 2 way setup
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 02:12 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Yup, Done it to several cars.

More a matter of what the speakers are like than the xover.

Last one I did was a BMW M3, with all Nakamichi.
The front was an absolute pain to adjust just because the speakers were such pigs to get right.

A tiny bit one way or the other in tuning and the speaker would turn very ugly.
The problem was more the mid than the other two.

End result was great, but for the money and time spent, I think there are more cost effective ways of getting very close sonically.

Personally I'm using two way fronts and boot sub (once I've built the sub that is)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2006, 08:09 PM   #3
v-bro is offline v-bro  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
v-bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Most active filtering messes up the signal because they use cheap op-amps/components and a long signal path...
My experience is better with the very easy to build and deadcheap pllxo filters:
http://www.t-linespeakers.org/tech/f...ssiveHLxo.html

To maybe make things a little easier to understand from the start:

Resistor in series capacitor parallel cuts the highs, capacitor in series resistor parallel cuts the lows(same values, same x-over frequency).

Increasing values lowers x-over freq.
Decreasing values rises x-over freq.

With only two components per channel you can create a 6db's decreasing per octave filter!

With only four components per channel you can create a 12db's decreasing per octave filter!

Choise of component quality in order of preference:
Capacitor:"peanutbutter oil soaked paper-foil caps" (joke) "MKP","MKC","MKT".
Resistor:at least "metalfilm"
__________________
Max. cone displacement can be several foot on any speaker!Too bad it can be done only once......
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2006, 12:08 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Searching for the right words so bare with me.

The active xover isn't the problem.
It's the speakers.
As such the line level passive is no better than an active.

More expensive speakers (like the three way nak) have more in their passive xover than just a xover point.
they also have notch filters, compensation circuits etc.

What an active xover has is a xover point and level controls.
If the speaker has a spike or dip in it's response, then unles you have a proper eq/parametric, it's going to be very hard to adjust a std electronic xover to get the speakers to their best.

Example; take a decent domestic speaker system.
rip out the xover and make a new one that only does basic xover duties, no corrections at all.
wouldn't this sound terrible.

Thats why I think a two way is easier to biamp, the speakers have to be more foriving and smoother individual responce curves to begin with.
Meaning no real need for notches etc..

All very rough, not looking at exact speaker details etc, rather a general over view.

Well that s my thoughts anyway........
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2006, 10:30 AM   #5
v-bro is offline v-bro  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
v-bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Any type of filtering is possible in a passive way, active filters have the advantage of keeping the outputlevel high. Extensive passive filtering can suffer high insertion loss, a preamp can help out when this occurs.
A passive filter has the advantage of low noise and low component count and is thus good sound quality+ easier and cheaper to build.
Look at this one (available as a kit, needs no power...): http://www.marchandelec.com/xm46.html
__________________
Max. cone displacement can be several foot on any speaker!Too bad it can be done only once......
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2006, 06:59 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
I always thought the advantage of active crossvers are, manipulating signals BEFORE they are amplified and carries power. It is difficult to separate a powered signal that goes from -50V to +50V DC with 4-5 Amps using passive components.

Sure there are cheap OpAmps and etc used in Car Crossovers, but the same opamps are used in the amplifiers as well.

But the notch filters and built-in EQs that a passive circuit has... that's something that needs to be considered with active crossovers....

I found a cheap Clarion 3way crossover for $60. I'll just buy it and give it a try.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2006, 08:21 PM   #7
v-bro is offline v-bro  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
v-bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
It just depends on whether the signal goes directly through, many good amps use op-amps only for dc-offsetting and other purposes not haveing the signal passing right through...

Passive filtering on the INput of a power amp requires only very small components where there's only little current and voltage...therefore the components don't even have to be able to "handle" much...

Choosing the right drivers can make simple filtering possible and many commercial designs done that way are legendary for their soundquality.

I'm afraid the clarion will not lead to longterm satisfaction (as it wouldn't for me). Maybe it can help tuning the system more easy, but I would recommend experimenting with one passive filter stage in the first place to get acquainted with it and learn from it.... and hear the better quality yourself....
__________________
Max. cone displacement can be several foot on any speaker!Too bad it can be done only once......
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Active bi-amp - Which electronic crossover? rhapsodee Multi-Way 42 17th December 2012 10:56 PM
electronic crossover modification qguy Multi-Way 5 4th January 2007 11:54 PM
Electronic crossover JBLFAN Multi-Way 2 21st November 2004 07:16 AM
Electronic Crossover PWB BobK Multi-Way 19 30th September 2004 03:07 AM
Electronic crossover possible? Alvin Multi-Way 1 31st May 2004 09:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2